THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Search results
- 1) Contributing updates and license submission tool:2 KB (342 words) - 18:58, 13 December 2018
- ** Proposed: In new XML format, any new property where cardinality is >1, will have two properties: singular to represent the individual element, an1 KB (176 words) - 01:38, 5 February 2020
- 1) Open Source Leadership Summit coming up, March 12-14. SPDX face2face on th1 KB (252 words) - 04:19, 22 February 2019
- 1) Open Source Leadership Summit agenda * SPDX f2f time is Monday afternoon 1-5pm3 KB (506 words) - 04:21, 22 February 2019
- 1) go through outstanding issues for 3.5 release and update: ...to have all tied up by next Friday, Mar 29 then do actual release on April 12 KB (336 words) - 18:13, 21 March 2019
- ** Merged some of the external repository features as a library into 4.1 * 1 draft – not sure which one this is1 KB (194 words) - 18:11, 9 April 2019
- ** Porting license expression library: 12 KB (217 words) - 18:05, 16 April 2019
- 1) Steve and Gary gave a great presentation on the general call prior to this2 KB (364 words) - 14:46, 2 May 2019
- 1) meetings posted for April 4th; most of work from April 18th are mostly in5 KB (931 words) - 23:26, 2 May 2019
- 1) Update on GSoC - maybe next call have Gary update us on which projects are ...iew, see: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/jlovejoy-inclusion-1/DOCS/what-why-how.md2 KB (427 words) - 17:35, 16 May 2019
- 1) GSoC update from Umang who is working on a project to enhance the workflow * 1 week prior: all PRs have been merged that are going to be part of release a4 KB (633 words) - 18:28, 30 May 2019
- ...ibe “ALL” the license that apply to a distinct package. If more than 1 separate work, it becomes confusing.3 KB (422 words) - 18:03, 4 June 2019
- 1) Joint tech/legal team calls:4 KB (700 words) - 03:50, 18 July 2019
- 1) Follow-up conversation re: “SPDX-Copyright:” or related tags – sugge ...ion on whether or not to add a license to the list. If >= 3 people give a +1 and no objections, then fine, easy to add. If complicated issues, then labe2 KB (354 words) - 18:11, 5 August 2019
- *** 1 Unskilled suppliers3 KB (495 words) - 18:52, 5 September 2019
- * 1 repository still needs to be moved – JavaScript project799 B (108 words) - 21:26, 17 September 2019
- * NTIA phase 1 documents are published at https://www.ntia.gov/sbom (SPDX is a recognized * Pushing Jan meeting to 1/9.2 KB (279 words) - 16:29, 5 December 2019
- ** Many to many? 1:1? 1:*, *:1?1 KB (175 words) - 02:20, 29 April 2020
- ==SPDX 2.2.1== * 1 to 2 weeks we should be “throwing the switch”3 KB (412 words) - 18:04, 12 May 2020
- ==SPDX 2.2.1== ...nging back one of student proposals through community bridge, update June 1.4 KB (603 words) - 19:38, 19 May 2020
- * The project is scheduled to start July 1 and run through end of September2 KB (335 words) - 20:27, 7 June 2020
- ** 2.1 is in good shape *** We are through phase 1 (funding for this year)1 KB (217 words) - 15:35, 6 August 2020
- * Will be turn on Sept. 13 KB (427 words) - 18:06, 18 August 2020
- *** pushed first draft of fields for (1) vulnerabilities, and (2) defects => impact on packages, false positives, e *** 1 for transitioning / updating online SPDX tools4 KB (561 words) - 18:15, 7 May 2021
- * [https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/blob/development/v2.2.1/ontology/spdx-ontology.owl.xml Current RDF/OWL document for SPDX spec] 1. Enable developers with a "code view" of tool-generated SPDX document close14 KB (2,166 words) - 14:36, 7 February 2022