THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Technical Team/Minutes/2016-02-16
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
February 9, 2016
Attendees
- Gary O'Neall
- Kate Stewart
- Bill Schineller
- Yev Bronshteyn
- Scott Sterling
- Mark Gisi
Package External ID's Proposal
- Proposal at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6LWnkh5GbMV9Xo5_zJ0wTNLROEIa4o1OU279YueI90/edit
- Restructured document similar to the license list - previous section 2.12 is no its own section
- Discussion on external reference list version - Kate will review
- External Reference - Should we have a delimiter between repository and ID?
- Specific to the repository type - hard to choose a single delimiter character that may not be used
- Proposal to follow the pattern for section 2.6 - external document references
- First space is a delimiter
- Everything after the first space up until the end of line is the repository
- Do we restrict it to one line?
- Debian example where multiple lines may desireable
- We can always add <text> in later and not loose backwards compatibility
- Decided on one line - will re-evaluate adding <text> in the future
- External Reference Location
- Should it be section 9 or section 6?
- 6 is already used in the spec
- Updated text in section to indicate that all mandatory fields must be present after the ID
- ID Format
- Should we remove the "+"
- Doesn't have the same issue as license ID
- Should we be consistent with the license ID?
- License refs will no longer allow "+" in version 2.1 of the spec
- Decide to be consistent with the license ID - no + allowed
- Should we remove the "+"
- Category discussion 3.21
- Should this be in the package instance area or part of the external reference (currently section 6 and spdx external reference list)
- Relationship type is instance specific
- Proposal:
- Add externalReferenceCatagory to the external reference section to denote categories that are associated with the externalReference
- Add comment to the externalReference (currently section 6)
- Leave the category in section 3 as an "override" - change cardinality to optional
- Proposal was not confirmed in the meeting - Request for some specific examples - for next week