From SPDX Wiki
- Attendance: 9
- Minutes for 2011/12/15 approved
Technical Team Report - Gary
- Much focus on defining approach for 2.0 spec.
- Two key elements: Hierarchy and time element (revisions, supply chain, approvals)
- Progress forward, but some concern that we are not converging rapidly enough
- Key discussion about backwards compatibility and how important it is for 2.0.
Business Team Report - Kim
- New website has been recent focus.
- There was a training meeting and an email went to voluteers for content migration.
- Web team is implementing the new menu structure and will then green light volunteers to move content.
- That will take two weeks, followed by cleanup.
- License List addition process
- Dusted off notes from previous discussion and concluded it looked pretty good.
- Kim working with legal team to review
- Then we need to publish and implement
- Community outreach re: data license
- Kim reaching out to Gentoo, Fedora, Eclipse
- Thumbs up from Gentoo; waiting on Fedora and Eclipse
- Adding Gentoo licenses to license list
- SPDX outreach meeting
- Silicon Valley, April 6; plans in motion
Legal Team Report - Jilayne
- Preample to data license complete and will be published.
- License List
- License "Templatizing" is taking a new approach; better described as "license list matching guidelines."
- Good progress; lots of concensus
- Discussion about best form or forms in which to publish (CSV, Excel, HTML)
Cross Functional Issues – Phil
- Heads up- Potential for need for modest SPDX funding from participating companies in the future. Probably a when, not if.
Open Action Items
- Phil- If it looks like 2.0 may have backward compatibility issues, call broad meeting for community input.
- Phil Odence, Black Duck Software
- Kim Weins, OpenLogic
- Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
- Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
- Pierre LaPonte, nexB
- Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
- Jack Manbeck, TI
- Steve Cropper, Cisco
- Chuck Gaudreau, Protecode