THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2010-12-21"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | == Attendees == | |
+ | |||
+ | * Bill Schineller | ||
+ | * Gary O'Neall | ||
+ | * Peter Williams | ||
+ | * Kate Stewart | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Review of previous meetings == | ||
+ | |||
+ | RDF to Tag notation - Kate to provide a grammer. Will include the zlib example in the tag/value format | ||
+ | |||
+ | Key discussion point is how the implicit section boundaries will impact forward compatibility (issue 589) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Review of issues recorded in the issue tracking == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Issue 590 - How individual files are referenced: | ||
+ | * Discussed use cases for having a unique reference to a file | ||
+ | * Discussed whether we should have a single URL for a file | ||
+ | * Areed that in the RDF, there needs to be a single URI (whether created by conventions or auto | ||
+ | |||
+ | generated in rdf/xml) | ||
+ | * Discussed an approach we feel will have merit where the tag/value format has 2 tags for a file | ||
+ | |||
+ | (package + file) and we have some documented conventions for converting between these 2 tags and the RDF | ||
+ | |||
+ | file URI | ||
+ | |||
+ | * We can use the example created for the tag notation to solidify the proposal | ||
+ | |||
+ | Discussion on the repository | ||
+ | * git repositories have been setup - the ontology | ||
+ | * Master will be the official version of the spec | ||
+ | * Proposal to have a post-commit rake task create the ontology | ||
+ | |||
+ | Need the appendices added to the git repository | ||
+ | |||
+ | Peter will send out an email on how to pull down the spdx-spec from the git repo | ||
+ | |||
+ | All - review the spdx-spec and document any questions/issues | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Technical|Minutes]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Minutes]] |
Latest revision as of 12:56, 6 March 2013
Attendees
- Bill Schineller
- Gary O'Neall
- Peter Williams
- Kate Stewart
Review of previous meetings
RDF to Tag notation - Kate to provide a grammer. Will include the zlib example in the tag/value format
Key discussion point is how the implicit section boundaries will impact forward compatibility (issue 589)
Review of issues recorded in the issue tracking
Issue 590 - How individual files are referenced:
- Discussed use cases for having a unique reference to a file
- Discussed whether we should have a single URL for a file
- Areed that in the RDF, there needs to be a single URI (whether created by conventions or auto
generated in rdf/xml)
- Discussed an approach we feel will have merit where the tag/value format has 2 tags for a file
(package + file) and we have some documented conventions for converting between these 2 tags and the RDF
file URI
- We can use the example created for the tag notation to solidify the proposal
Discussion on the repository
- git repositories have been setup - the ontology
- Master will be the official version of the spec
- Proposal to have a post-commit rake task create the ontology
Need the appendices added to the git repository
Peter will send out an email on how to pull down the spdx-spec from the git repo
All - review the spdx-spec and document any questions/issues