|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Attendees:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Bill Schinelle</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Gary O'Neall</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Peter Williams</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Kate Stewart</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Next week - move time to 4:00PM Eastern</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">- Kate's grammar for the 'tag-value' format / DEB-5</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">- Gary's slides for tools to be made available</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">- recap / status of inclusion of new license fields</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">- Proposal process</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Grammar Tag-Value / DEB-5</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>- Is there a difference between the grammar embedded and the proposed grammar?</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Similar.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Purpose of Kate's proposal is to resolve ambiguities.</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Difference in syntax of the grammar - DEB-5 compatibility would require a different grammar </span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">representation</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Concern about forward compatibility - ability of a version X parser to understand version X+N documents</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- There is a goal to be compatible with the DEB-5 which would lead more to the DEB-5 based grammar</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Need a way to map between the RDF and tag value and between tag value and RDF</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">Gary's slides for tools to be made available</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Can the pretty printer output tag-value</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>- Concern about not having a formal parser for the tag-value - could lead to bugs if hand-coded emitter for the tag-value</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 2;"> </span>- Gary agreed to prototype a tag-value emitter</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Gary will ping Kate for the current Spreadsheet format</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- For contribution/feedback switch from emailing spdx.org to use bugzilla</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Mention that in the spec there will be a grammar and an RDF OWL document</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: small;">recap / status of inclusion of new license fields</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- An asserted license field seems to have achieved consensus</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Proposal to split the license field into asserted license, "detected" or "seen" license, and a comment field</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"> </span>- Will continue the proposal process on the spdx-tech mailing list and in bugzilla</span></span></p>
| + | == Attendees == |
| | + | |
| | + | * Bill Schinelle |
| | + | * Gary O'Neall |
| | + | * Peter Williams |
| | + | * Kate Stewart |
| | + | |
| | + | Next week - move time to 4:00PM Eastern |
| | + | |
| | + | == Agenda == |
| | + | |
| | + | * Kate's grammar for the 'tag-value' format / DEB-5 |
| | + | * Gary's slides for tools to be made available |
| | + | * recap / status of inclusion of new license fields |
| | + | * Proposal process |
| | + | |
| | + | == Grammar Tag-Value / DEB-5 == |
| | + | |
| | + | * Is there a difference between the grammar embedded and the proposed grammar? |
| | + | * Similar. Purpose of Kate's proposal is to resolve ambiguities. |
| | + | * Difference in syntax of the grammar |
| | + | * DEB-5 compatibility would require a different grammar |
| | + | |
| | + | == representation == |
| | + | |
| | + | * Concern about forward compatibility - ability of a version X parser to understand version X+N documents |
| | + | * There is a goal to be compatible with the DEB-5 which would lead more to the DEB-5 based grammar |
| | + | * Need a way to map between the RDF and tag value and between tag value and RDF |
| | + | |
| | + | == Gary's slides for tools to be made available == |
| | + | |
| | + | * Can the pretty printer output tag-value |
| | + | * Concern about not having a formal parser for the tag-value - could lead to bugs if hand-coded emitter for the tag-value |
| | + | * Gary agreed to prototype a tag-value emitter |
| | + | * Gary will ping Kate for the current Spreadsheet format |
| | + | * For contribution/feedback switch from emailing spdx.org to use bugzilla |
| | + | * Mention that in the spec there will be a grammar and an RDF OWL document |
| | + | |
| | + | == recap / status of inclusion of new license fields == |
| | + | |
| | + | * An asserted license field seems to have achieved consensus |
| | + | * Proposal to split the license field into asserted license, "detected" or "seen" license, and a comment field |
| | + | * Will continue the proposal process on the spdx-tech mailing list and in bugzilla |
| | + | |
| | + | [[Category:Technical|Minutes]] |
| | + | [[Category:Minutes]] |
