THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "General Meeting/Minutes/2011-08-11"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p>Attendance: 16+</p><p>NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it. </p><p> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><strong>Technical Team Report - Kate<br /></strong></p>
+
* Attendance: 16+
−
<ul><li>New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial</li><li>Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF</li><li>Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15</li><li>Tools updated</li><li>New example available</li></ul>
+
* NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it.
  
−
<p><strong>Business Team Report - Kim</strong></p>
+
== Technical Team Report - Kate ==
−
<ul><li>GA <br /><ul><li>Press release shaping up; Kim reviewed list of names to be included</li><li>JimZ will mention in Keynote, Phil O. &amp; Esteban R. have speaking slot</li><li>BOF session not yet on website; Thursday, 8/18 at 5:15 pm</li><li>SPDX booth staffing in progress; John Ellis working schedule; 1 pg handout will be available</li></ul></li><li>SPDX Website update<ul><li>Don't believe we'll be ready to cutover from sandbox to live site in time for launch</li><li>Kim will update Home page on live site in prep for launch</li><li>Kate will ensure spec is up to date on live site</li></ul></li><li>FAQs<ul><li>Asked all volunteers to get their contributions in by end of day Tuesday</li></ul></li></ul>
+
  
−
<p><strong>Legal Team Report - Rockett<br /></strong></p>
+
* New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial
−
<ul><li>Circulated draft of revised trademark &amp; compliance statements<br /><ul><li>Deep discussion on this topic resulted in additional proposed changes</li><li>"Policing" policy concerns raised; recommendation is to follow LF policy of community notification</li><li>Concerns about requiring attribution/compliance statement inside SPDX file requiring change to spec</li><li>Decided that no attribution statement will be included in SPDX file at this time; we will revisit post 1.0 GA</li><li>Rockett has the action item to send final wording to Kate</li></ul></li><li>Data license discussion<ul><li>Some team members concerned that use of PDDL, even with language about side-agreement re confidentially may affect adoption of spec by those who are working with packages that contain proprietary code</li><li>Other team members believe that allowing data licenses other than PDDL will affect adoption by open source community</li><li>Noted that Karen Copenhaver discussed this use with the author of PDDL and we have agreement that this use is compliant with intent of license; current wording provided by Karen C. after review with author</li><li>Decided that v1.0 will stipulate PDDL as only license for data</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Open Action Items</strong></p>
+
* Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF
−
<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- Posting BOM info</li></ul>
+
* Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15
 +
* Tools updated
 +
* New example available
  
−
<p class="p1"><strong>Attendees</strong></p><ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kamak Hassin, Protecode</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, Open Logic</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Esteban Rockett, Motorola</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Adam , Cisco</li><li>Mark Gisi, Wind River</li><li>Branden Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Jack Manbeck, TI</li><li>Steve Cropper, Cisco</li></ul>
+
== Business Team Report - Kim ==
 +
 
 +
* GA
 +
** Press release shaping up; Kim reviewed list of names to be included
 +
** JimZ will mention in Keynote, Phil O. &amp; Esteban R. have speaking slot
 +
** BOF session not yet on website; Thursday, 8/18 at 5:15 pm
 +
** SPDX booth staffing in progress; John Ellis working schedule; 1 pg handout will be available
 +
* SPDX Website update
 +
** Don't believe we'll be ready to cutover from sandbox to live site in time for launch
 +
** Kim will update Home page on live site in prep for launch
 +
** Kate will ensure spec is up to date on live site
 +
* FAQs
 +
** Asked all volunteers to get their contributions in by end of day Tuesday
 +
 
 +
== Legal Team Report - Rockett ==
 +
 
 +
* Circulated draft of revised trademark &amp; compliance statements
 +
** Deep discussion on this topic resulted in additional proposed changes
 +
** "Policing" policy concerns raised; recommendation is to follow LF policy of community notification
 +
** Concerns about requiring attribution/compliance statement inside SPDX file requiring change to spec
 +
** Decided that no attribution statement will be included in SPDX file at this time; we will revisit post 1.0 GA
 +
** Rockett has the action item to send final wording to Kate
 +
* Data license discussion
 +
** Some team members concerned that use of PDDL, even with language about side-agreement re confidentially may affect adoption of spec by those who are working with packages that contain proprietary code
 +
** Other team members believe that allowing data licenses other than PDDL will affect adoption by open source community
 +
** Noted that Karen Copenhaver discussed this use with the author of PDDL and we have agreement that this use is compliant with intent of license; current wording provided by Karen C. after review with author
 +
** Decided that v1.0 will stipulate PDDL as only license for data
 +
 
 +
== Open Action Items ==
 +
 
 +
* MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING
 +
* Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly
 +
* Michael H. -- Posting BOM info
 +
 
 +
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software
 +
* Kamak Hassin, Protecode
 +
* Kim Weins, OpenLogic
 +
* Peter Williams, Open Logic
 +
* Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
 +
* Martin Michlmayr, HP
 +
* Kate Stewart, Canonical
 +
* Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
 +
* Esteban Rockett, Motorola
 +
* Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation
 +
* Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
 +
* Adam , Cisco
 +
* Mark Gisi, Wind River
 +
* Branden Robinson, Cisco
 +
* Jack Manbeck, TI
 +
* Steve Cropper, Cisco
 +
 
 +
[[Category:General|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 11:22, 6 March 2013

  • Attendance: 16+
  • NOTE: I believe many folks joined whose names I did not capture. Let me know if your name is not here, and I'll be happy to add it.

Technical Team Report - Kate

  • New draft of spec posted as of 8/10; no field changes, just editorial
  • Open issue on data license; need agreement between spec and RDF
  • Deadline for feedback by early am 8/15
  • Tools updated
  • New example available

Business Team Report - Kim

  • GA
    • Press release shaping up; Kim reviewed list of names to be included
    • JimZ will mention in Keynote, Phil O. & Esteban R. have speaking slot
    • BOF session not yet on website; Thursday, 8/18 at 5:15 pm
    • SPDX booth staffing in progress; John Ellis working schedule; 1 pg handout will be available
  • SPDX Website update
    • Don't believe we'll be ready to cutover from sandbox to live site in time for launch
    • Kim will update Home page on live site in prep for launch
    • Kate will ensure spec is up to date on live site
  • FAQs
    • Asked all volunteers to get their contributions in by end of day Tuesday

Legal Team Report - Rockett

  • Circulated draft of revised trademark & compliance statements
    • Deep discussion on this topic resulted in additional proposed changes
    • "Policing" policy concerns raised; recommendation is to follow LF policy of community notification
    • Concerns about requiring attribution/compliance statement inside SPDX file requiring change to spec
    • Decided that no attribution statement will be included in SPDX file at this time; we will revisit post 1.0 GA
    • Rockett has the action item to send final wording to Kate
  • Data license discussion
    • Some team members concerned that use of PDDL, even with language about side-agreement re confidentially may affect adoption of spec by those who are working with packages that contain proprietary code
    • Other team members believe that allowing data licenses other than PDDL will affect adoption by open source community
    • Noted that Karen Copenhaver discussed this use with the author of PDDL and we have agreement that this use is compliant with intent of license; current wording provided by Karen C. after review with author
    • Decided that v1.0 will stipulate PDDL as only license for data

Open Action Items

  • MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING
  • Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly
  • Michael H. -- Posting BOM info

Attendees

  • Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software
  • Kamak Hassin, Protecode
  • Kim Weins, OpenLogic
  • Peter Williams, Open Logic
  • Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
  • Martin Michlmayr, HP
  • Kate Stewart, Canonical
  • Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
  • Esteban Rockett, Motorola
  • Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation
  • Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
  • Adam , Cisco
  • Mark Gisi, Wind River
  • Branden Robinson, Cisco
  • Jack Manbeck, TI
  • Steve Cropper, Cisco
Retrieved from "https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2011-08-11&oldid=1219"