THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/Minutes/2011-04-20"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p><p>SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>Any Wilson (Intel)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>**</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.&nbsp;</p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0&nbsp;(http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches. &nbsp;Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>***</p><div></div></p>
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
 +
* Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
 +
* Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
 +
* Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
 +
* Phil Odence (Blackduck)
 +
* Paul Madick (HP)
 +
* Kate Stewart (Canonical)
 +
* Michael Herzog (NexB)
 +
* Scott Peterson (HP)
 +
* Andy Wilson (Intel)
 +
 
 +
== Minutes ==
 +
 
 +
The group continued to drive on the below key issues:
 +
 
 +
# The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;
 +
# Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and
 +
# Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.
 +
 
 +
For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.
 +
 
 +
For #2, the group began discussing the [http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/|Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0], and other alternative approaches. Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Legal|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 18:45, 5 March 2013

Attendees

  • Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
  • Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
  • Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
  • Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
  • Phil Odence (Blackduck)
  • Paul Madick (HP)
  • Kate Stewart (Canonical)
  • Michael Herzog (NexB)
  • Scott Peterson (HP)
  • Andy Wilson (Intel)

Minutes

The group continued to drive on the below key issues:

  1. The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;
  2. Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and
  3. Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.

For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.

For #2, the group began discussing the Data Commons PDDL 1.0, and other alternative approaches. Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.