Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2020-06-09"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "June 9, 2020 == Attendees == * Kate Stewart * Jack Manbeck * John Mudge * Rex Jaeschke * 12066042189 * Brad Goldring * Emmanuel * Jilayne Lovejoy * Matija Suklje * Nisha Kumar...")
 
(Licensing Profile)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* coding has started
 
* coding has started
  
==Licensing Profile==
+
==SPDX 3.0 Licensing Profile==
 
* Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues
 
* Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues
 
* Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385
 
* Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385
Line 45: Line 45:
 
** Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license
 
** Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license
 
** Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses
 
** Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses
 +
** Vicky recommended that since the tool creators are requesting it, that should weigh in to the decision.
 
** Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license
 
** Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license
 +
*** Kate agrees that clarity around roles is going to be needed
 
* General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense
 
* General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense
 
* Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion
 
* Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion

Revision as of 23:35, 11 June 2020

June 9, 2020

Attendees

  • Kate Stewart
  • Jack Manbeck
  • John Mudge
  • Rex Jaeschke
  • 12066042189
  • Brad Goldring
  • Emmanuel
  • Jilayne Lovejoy
  • Matija Suklje
  • Nisha Kumar
  • Peter Shin
  • Rose Judge
  • Santiago Torres
  • Vicky Brasseur
  • Gary O’Neall
  • Mark Atwood

Topics: Rex/John update on 2.2.1 GSoC SPDX Tools


SPDX 2.2.1

  • Update from Rex
    • 6 remaining issues
      • Will be covered in a follow-up call with Kate. Any remaining issues will be brought to the group for next week
    • Question on formatting for the headings and the links
      • Jack, Kate, Thomas, Rex and John will discuss offline

GSoC

  • coding has started

SPDX 3.0 Licensing Profile

  • Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues
  • Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385
    • Collection of fields for license
  • Do we need a distributed license?
    • Both Jilayne and Steve believe that concluded license can be used
      • This was the original intent of concluded license
    • Thomas expressed an interest in clearly declaring a non-disjunctive license at the point of distribution
      • Different distributed licenses may be chosen for different customers
    • Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license
    • Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses
    • Vicky recommended that since the tool creators are requesting it, that should weigh in to the decision.
    • Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license
      • Kate agrees that clarity around roles is going to be needed
  • General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense
  • Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion
    • Description of use cases for DistributedLicense
    • Updated documentation for ConcludedLicense to include disjunctive choice
    • Documentation on Artifact

Next Week’s Agenda

  • 2.2.1 update
  • GSoC