THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2011-08-09"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Minutes 8/9/2011</span></p>
+
== Attendees ==
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Attendees:</span></p>
+
<ul>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Bill Schineller</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Branden Robinson</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Peter Williams</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Gary O’Neall</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Kate Stewart</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Nicholaas Loke</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Jack Manbeck</span></li>
+
<li><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Marshal</span></li></ul>
+
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Agenda:</span></p>
+
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
<ul><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Open bug list review</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Spec walkthrough/check for ambiguities</span></li></ul>
+
  
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
* Bill Schineller
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Review open bug list</span></p>
+
* Kirsten Newcomer
<ul><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">887 - Do we have structured strings for creator, reviewer, …?  Agreed that in the future, the RDF structure will probably be different than a structured string but we do not have time to create, review and implement a proposal. Agreed to have a structured string for this release – Peter will propose a more formal syntax.  Note: SPDX tools currently doea a simple partial validation of strings starting with “PERSON:”, “ORGANIZATION:”, etc.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">728 - Move examples to spdx.org – leave in spdx.org/spec/examples – Kirsten will create subcatory for “work in progress”, once reviewed we can label the examples as conforming to the spec.  Can close bug.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Xxx – What license is the RDF terms released under, need to confirm with legal.  Peter will follow-up with legal.  Proposal to make the rdf spec </span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: small;">874 – packageOriginator and packageSuppler -&gt; originator, supplier – spec is being updated.  Tools will be updated and re-uploaded this morning to make consistent.  </span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Suggest that the class order in the rdf terms page match the order from the spec</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">656 – closed after review of license text and license index</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">883 – agree we don’t need ascending order for license ID’s – assigned bug to Kate and will e fixed in next rev of the spec</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">886 – broken link, assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">888 – rdf example fix - assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release</span></li></ul>
+
* Branden Robinson
 +
* Peter Williams
 +
* Gary O’Neall
 +
* Kate Stewart
 +
* Nicholaas Loke
 +
* Jack Manbeck
 +
* Marshal
  
 +
== Agenda ==
  
 +
* Open bug list review
 +
* Spec walkthrough/check for ambiguities
  
 +
== Review open bug list ==
  
 +
* 887 - Do we have structured strings for creator, reviewer, …? Agreed that in the future, the RDF structure will probably be different than a structured string but we do not have time to create, review and implement a proposal. Agreed to have a structured string for this release – Peter will propose a more formal syntax. Note: SPDX tools currently doea a simple partial validation of strings starting with “PERSON:”, “ORGANIZATION:”, etc.
 +
* 728 - Move examples to spdx.org – leave in spdx.org/spec/examples – Kirsten will create subcatory for “work in progress”, once reviewed we can label the examples as conforming to the spec. Can close bug.
 +
* Xxx – What license is the RDF terms released under, need to confirm with legal. Peter will follow-up with legal. Proposal to make the rdf spec
 +
* 874 – packageOriginator and packageSuppler → originator, supplier – spec is being updated. Tools will be updated and re-uploaded this morning to make consistent.
 +
* Suggest that the class order in the rdf terms page match the order from the spec
 +
* 656 – closed after review of license text and license index
 +
* 883 – agree we don’t need ascending order for license ID’s – assigned bug to Kate and will e fixed in next rev of the spec
 +
* 886 – broken link, assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release
 +
* 888 – rdf example fix - assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release
  
 +
== Walkthrough of spec changes ==
  
 +
* Reviewed updates (a few changes were noted “spdx.com” → “spdx.org”)
 +
* Request to make sections 5 and 6 consistent in the statement for what is required and optional – Steve to send an email describing request to the group
 +
* Decided to change the status of the rdf terms from “testing” to “stable”
  
 +
== Other status ==
  
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
* RDF terms will be updated by this afternoon (Peter)
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Walkthrough of spec changes</span></p>
+
* Gary will review the doc, rdf terms, and tool property values for consistency
<ul><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Reviewed updates (a few changes were noted “spdx.com” -&gt; “spdx.org”)</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Request to make sections 5 and 6 consistent in the statement for what is required and optional – Steve to send an email describing request to the group</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Decided to change the status of the rdf terms from “testing” to “stable”</span></li></ul>
+
  
 
+
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]]
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+
[[Category:Minutes]]
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Other status</span></p>
+
<ul><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">RDF terms will be updated by this afternoon (Peter)</span></li><li><span style="font-size: small;">·</span>        <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Gary will review the doc, rdf terms, and tool property values for consistency</span></li></ul>
+
 
+
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p>
+

Latest revision as of 13:17, 6 March 2013

Attendees

  • Bill Schineller
  • Kirsten Newcomer
  • Branden Robinson
  • Peter Williams
  • Gary O’Neall
  • Kate Stewart
  • Nicholaas Loke
  • Jack Manbeck
  • Marshal

Agenda

  • Open bug list review
  • Spec walkthrough/check for ambiguities

Review open bug list

  • 887 - Do we have structured strings for creator, reviewer, …? Agreed that in the future, the RDF structure will probably be different than a structured string but we do not have time to create, review and implement a proposal. Agreed to have a structured string for this release – Peter will propose a more formal syntax. Note: SPDX tools currently doea a simple partial validation of strings starting with “PERSON:”, “ORGANIZATION:”, etc.
  • 728 - Move examples to spdx.org – leave in spdx.org/spec/examples – Kirsten will create subcatory for “work in progress”, once reviewed we can label the examples as conforming to the spec. Can close bug.
  • Xxx – What license is the RDF terms released under, need to confirm with legal. Peter will follow-up with legal. Proposal to make the rdf spec
  • 874 – packageOriginator and packageSuppler → originator, supplier – spec is being updated. Tools will be updated and re-uploaded this morning to make consistent.
  • Suggest that the class order in the rdf terms page match the order from the spec
  • 656 – closed after review of license text and license index
  • 883 – agree we don’t need ascending order for license ID’s – assigned bug to Kate and will e fixed in next rev of the spec
  • 886 – broken link, assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release
  • 888 – rdf example fix - assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release

Walkthrough of spec changes

  • Reviewed updates (a few changes were noted “spdx.com” → “spdx.org”)
  • Request to make sections 5 and 6 consistent in the statement for what is required and optional – Steve to send an email describing request to the group
  • Decided to change the status of the rdf terms from “testing” to “stable”

Other status

  • RDF terms will be updated by this afternoon (Peter)
  • Gary will review the doc, rdf terms, and tool property values for consistency