THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/License List/Licenses Under Consideration"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 70: Line 70:
 
| 2013-01-01
 
| 2013-01-01
 
| to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. '''more research needed''' to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
 
| to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. '''more research needed''' to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
 +
|-
 +
| Artistic-Perl-1.0
 +
|  <span style="display: none;">2</span> Under Review
 +
| 2013-06-06
 +
| From the email:
 +
# Full Name for the license: Artistic License (Perl) 1.0
 +
# Proposed License Short Identifier: Artistic-Perl-1.0
 +
# URL reference to the license text: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/artistic.html
 +
# Yes - the license is not OSI-approved
 +
 +
A formatted text file with the license text from the URL provided in #3 has been attached with this e-mail.
 +
 +
Even though, the ‘Artistic License – 1.0’ and ‘Artistic License – 2.0’ are included in the SPDX License List, I feel a need to also include the ‘‘Artistic License (Perl) – 1.0’.
 +
The ‘Artistic License (Perl) - 1.0’ contains an extra clause and is used in a wide range of PERL based programs.
 +
 +
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 16:41, 6 June 2013

This table is used to track license list requests and is maintained by the Legal team.

We started tracking license requests in this table after release 1.18 of the License List. Entries submitted prior to that had their Date Submitted arbitrarily set to January 1, 2013.

Status Name Explanation
Accepted vX.yy The license was added to the SPDX License List for the version indicated. The version indicated may be yet to be released in the case where a license is accepted in between SPDX License List releases.
Under Review A license addition has been requested and is currently under review.
Not Accepted The license was reviewed by the Legal Team and it was decided to not add the license to the SPDX License List at this time.
On Hold This means that more research is needed or there are other extenuating factors that have prevented a decision on the addition of the license to be made. See the Notes for more information.


Licenses Under Consideration

License Status Date Submitted Notes
Artistic License (Perl) 1.0 Under Review 2013-6-03 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/557

Even though, the ‘Artistic License – 1.0’ and ‘Artistic License – 2.0’ are included in the SPDX License List, I feel a need to also include the ‘‘Artistic License (Perl) – 1.0’. The ‘Artistic License (Perl) - 1.0’ contains an extra clause and is used in a wide range of PERL based programs.

Zend Engine v2.0 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
"old" MIT 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201
Unlicense 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal
US Gov't works 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler
GPL-2.0 identifier 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 issue of potential confusion with short identifier "GPL-2.0" meaning GPLv2 only; whereas GPLv2 or later, uses short identifier "GPL-2.0+" should short identifier be changed to "GPL-2.0-only" for symmetry and clarity?
  1. what would the ramifications of changing a short identifier be? had said we wouldn't not change short identifiers
  2. alternatively, could add in Notes field for all GNU licenses that short identifier "GPL-2.0" = GPL v2 only for clarification (but will this be "obvious" enough?
FLORA 4 Not Accepted 2013-01-01 decided not to add at this point in time, pending completion of license inclusion guidelines. see http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/month=20121101 for most recent thread on the topic and meeting minutes where discussed at: Legal_Team/Minutes/2012-10-31
Unicode 3 On Hold 2013-01-01 to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
Artistic-Perl-1.0 2 Under Review 2013-06-06 From the email:
  1. Full Name for the license: Artistic License (Perl) 1.0
  2. Proposed License Short Identifier: Artistic-Perl-1.0
  3. URL reference to the license text: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/artistic.html
  4. Yes - the license is not OSI-approved

A formatted text file with the license text from the URL provided in #3 has been attached with this e-mail.

Even though, the ‘Artistic License – 1.0’ and ‘Artistic License – 2.0’ are included in the SPDX License List, I feel a need to also include the ‘‘Artistic License (Perl) – 1.0’. The ‘Artistic License (Perl) - 1.0’ contains an extra clause and is used in a wide range of PERL based programs.