THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Technical Team/Minutes/2014-04-15
From SPDX Wiki
April 15, 2014
Attendees
- Gary O’Neall
- Bill Schineller
- Michael Herzog
- Michael Söderberg
- Scott Sterling
- Jack Manbeck
- Sameer Ahmed
- Kate Stewart
Agenda
- Review schedule on http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Business_Team/SPDX_2_0_Project
- Relationship and Usage
Schedule Review
- Who can make LinuxCon in Chicago and in Europe (Oct. 13)
- Kate and Jack can make both
- Gary is likely for Chicago, possible Europe
- Sameer not able to make either
- Bill - someone from Black Duck should be able to attend
- Review of SPDX_2_0_Project wiki page
- Added link to the current spec draft in the useful links
- Updated descriptions
- Gary to upload slides for object model and Jack
Relationship and Usage
- Relationship type is required
- Usage type is optional
- Do we still need a file type
- A usage is intrinsic to the relationship
- A file type is intrinsic to the file - independent of how it is used - e.g. a binary may be optional, dynamic library, data file depending on how it is used
- Review usage types from Gary's email
- Reference_Impl - instead of usage type Reference_Impl - use a more general example?
- Could remove
- Reference_Impl term has different symantics for different verticals
- Agree to remove - can come back to this in 2.1
- Reference_Impl - instead of usage type Reference_Impl - use a more general example?
- Review Bill's email on relationship types
- artifactOf - should be an extended version existing property and not a new relationshipType
- PatchOf - need both directions - patches or patchApplied and patchOn or Of
- Review of consolidated spreadsheet
- Gary to send out 1 line descriptions for each relationship/usage type in the use case analysis column
- Next week, we can use the spreadsheet to come up with a consolidated list of usage and relationship types