THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Technical Team/Minutes/2013-11-19
From SPDX Wiki
Nov. 19, 2013
Attendees
- Gary O’Neall
- Jack Manbeck
- Bill Schineller
- Scott Sterling
- Kate Stewart
- Marshall Clow
Agenda
- Review 2.0 model
2.0 model discussion
- Reviewed current merged model proposal: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/Proposals/2012-02-01/Merged_Model_Proposal
- Annotations use of comments – is it the same as the comment in SPDX element?
- Does it duplicate the function, should we remove?
- Should choose a different name in the properties/models
- Snippets – question on the utility.
- Agree to include in model
- Agree that the implementation decision can be made separately (e.g. we don’t need to implement in version 2.0, could be later). General agreement that the snippet use cases were lower priority than the hierarchical use cases
- Use cases for snippets were discussed – audit findings of GPL code snippet
- may be important to Samsung’s use
- Kate will go over the mode with Samsung in Japan
- Annotations use of comments – is it the same as the comment in SPDX element?
- Review email from Bruno and suggestions for 2.0
- Allow other checksums – Add bug to track, supported by the 1.2 and 2.0 models
- File type – markup file type for pom.xml, Add bug to track, supported by the 1.2 and 2.0 models
- Lines of code – suggest comments be added
- Filesize
- Discussion on how many properties we should add – don’t want to burden producers, extensions like annotations and comments could be used
- Suggestion to use Web Protégé as a collaboration tool for the SPDX ontology: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtege