THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Legal Team/Current Projects and Issues
LAST UPDATED: 25 April 2013
Contents
- 1 SPDX Legal Team projects for 2013
- 1.1 License List requests/additions tracking page
- 1.2 Review process for requesting a new license webpage
- 1.3 OSI outstanding issues
- 1.4 License Matching Guidelines - implement markup
- 1.5 GPL exceptions
- 1.6 Community outreach and list coordination
- 1.7 Recommendations or guidance on how to best determine license for a particular file
SPDX Legal Team projects for 2013
License List requests/additions tracking page
owner: Jack Manbeck (goal to get this up and current by end of May)
- create wiki page with table for tracking, with relevant/appropriate columns
- propagate with recent and outstanding requests
- update going forward
Review process for requesting a new license webpage
owner: Jason (first pass by 5/3, team to review at 5/10 meeting
OSI outstanding issues
owner: Jilayne
- various OSI approved (but old or deprecated) licenses don't have corresponding link on OSI site; OSI to update and then SPDX to add link to SPDX-LL
- Artistic license issue
- futher clarification on a few previous issues (were APSL-1.0, APSL-1.1, and GPL-2.0 ever approved?)
- zlib/ libpng license clarification
- Jabber Open Source License v1.0 – archived text here (http://archive.jabber.org/core/JOSL.pdf) is not the same as the OSI has on their site (it was OSI approved). What do we do about this? need to resolve with OSI (with goal of having on list b/c it was OSI approved and we endeavored to have all OSI licenses on SPDX list, even if old). license text also can be found at: http://code.google.com/p/jabber-net/wiki/FAQ_License
License Matching Guidelines - implement markup
once final method for markup has been decided upon, we will need to go through all licenses on current list and create appropriate markup files for each. Legal team will divvy up work and may ask for help from technical team as well. We will invariably find issues that will need to be discussed along the way - using the legal team bi-weekly calls for such discusssion
GPL exceptions
owner: Tom Vidal (goal to have this reasonably done by end of June)
- We don't have them all and there are also the issue of inconsistencies "in the wild" among named exceptions and actual text (i.e. not all exceptions found called Foo exception have the exact same text; how do we deal with this?)
Community outreach and list coordination
Goal of coordinating with various other license lists to make sure SPDX has licenses from these lists and check short name matching (or create "translation" document if different)
Fedora license list
owner: Paul Madick (goal to have first pass for Legal Team to begin reviewing by mid-June)
- will need to check lists for discrepancies, i.e. are there licenses on Fedora list that are not on SPDX-LL and if so, decide to add; also need to create short-name matching matrix due to Fedora using different type of categorization for its short names
Fossology
owner: TBD assigned
- coordinate with Bob Gobeille, see http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/MatchSPDXLicenceIDs
Gentoo
owner: TBD assigned
Suse
owner: TBD assigned
- list found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AqPp4y2wyQsbdGQ1V3pRRDg5NEpGVWpubzdRZ0tjUWc (courtesy of Ciaran Farrell from 6/27/12 email list thread)
Recommendations or guidance on how to best determine license for a particular file
'how to identify the license for an open source project - ex. Within the file versus whether there's a copying file on top of the directory ? provide guidance/suggstion (industry practice?) that license in the file is more determinate than the license in the directoryShould the legal group aggregate industry best practices and come up with a group of guidelines and provide some influence on that?