THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/Minutes/2013-09-25"
From SPDX Wiki
< Legal Team | Minutes
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
'''3) Fedora List''' - ran out of time; see email with NEW link for Google Drive doc; if you can't access, tell Jilayne. Also see separate email re: ideas on moving this forward via email/between calls | '''3) Fedora List''' - ran out of time; see email with NEW link for Google Drive doc; if you can't access, tell Jilayne. Also see separate email re: ideas on moving this forward via email/between calls | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Legal|Minutes]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Minutes]] |
Latest revision as of 18:22, 26 September 2013
Attendees
- Jilayne Lovejoy
- Zac White
- Dennis Clark
- Daniel German
- Paul Madick
- Mark Gisi
- Scott Lamons
AGENDA
1) Summary of LinuxCon happenings A day's worth of various meeting on Tuesday at LinuxCon
- Discussion about and outline created for Best Practices or How To guide to SPDX
- License Matching Guidelines discussion:
- discussed how to better sync-up matching guidelines with templates (proposed changes to guidelines subsequently sent to mail list)
- also discussed naming of the license list filed "standard header" and to "official license header" - generaly discussion about use of official headers, in that a license can be matched based on this
- versioning of license templates to sync on license list versioning - aiming for next release of license list (v1.20) to include a full set of templates
- Jilayne to drive work on going through list and bring issues to legal team to (hopefully) increase pace
- Adoption Discussion - most of this revolved around relatively new proposal of file-level license tagging using the SPDX License List short identifier (a la U-Boot); Jack has posted a draft of the proposal on the wiki at: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Business_Team/Adoption#Use_of_META_Tags
- talked to a few people about this idea whilst at LinuxCon and got encouraging feedback re: support and potential adoption
- Feedback from Samsung - Samsung gave a talk about their internal use of SPDX on Monday (see slides here: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Piloting%20SPDX%20in%20Samsung%20-%20case%20studies%20and%20experiences%20%28YoungTaek%20Kim%29.pdf
- had a follow-up meeting with Samsung to discuss feedback for SPDX and learn how they learned about SPDX on Tuesday; good feedback and ideas on needed documentation and tututorials
- Yocto integration update from Matt at UNO and Jack
- Tools update from Gary
- met with GitHub as introduction to SPDX and discuss how www.choosealicense.com came to be; identified some areas where we can collaborate in short-term and potential future work
2) Provide feedback for revised License Matching Guidelines - discussed some edits to this; Jilayne to send another rev to group, post-call
3) Fedora List - ran out of time; see email with NEW link for Google Drive doc; if you can't access, tell Jilayne. Also see separate email re: ideas on moving this forward via email/between calls