THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/License List/Licenses Under Consideration"
(→Licenses Under Consideration) |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Unlicense | | Unlicense | ||
| − | | <span style="display: none;">3</span> | + | | <span style="display: none;">3</span> Accepted in v1.19 |
| 2013-01-01 | | 2013-01-01 | ||
| see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal | | see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal | ||
Revision as of 18:18, 1 August 2013
This table is used to track license list requests and is maintained by the Legal team.
We started tracking license requests in this table after release 1.18 of the License List. Entries submitted prior to that had their Date Submitted arbitrarily set to January 1, 2013.
| Status Name | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Accepted in v__ | The license was added to indicated version of the SPDX License List. The SPDX License List version indicated may be yet to be released in the case where a license is accepted in between SPDX License List releases. |
| Under Review | A license addition has been requested and is currently under review. |
| Not Accepted | The license was reviewed by the Legal Team and it was decided to not add the license to the SPDX License List at this time. |
| On Hold | This means that more research is needed or there are other extenuating factors that have prevented a decision on the addition of the license to be made. See the Notes for more information. |
| License | Status | Date Submitted | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM PowerPC Initialization and Boot Software (ibm-pibs) | Under Review | 2013-7-30 | http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pci.c
A disjunctive license offering a choice of GPL 2.0 or an IBM open source license. Also see: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/166449 |
| Sun Industry Standards Source License 1.2 (SISSL-1.2) | Accepted in v1.19 | 2013-7-18 | http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/Gridengine_SISSL_license.html
" It also seems that there is a 1.2 version of this license (http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/Gridengine_SISSL_license.html )." from Camille Moulin camille.moulin@alterway.fr via lists.spdx.org, in the context of a discussion about whether the ID for SISSL (which has no version suffix) should be changed. Also see: http://spdx.org/licenses/SISSL and http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/sissl_license.html |
| Artistic License (Perl) 1.0 | Under Review | 2013-6-03 | http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/557
Even though, the ‘Artistic License – 1.0’ and ‘Artistic License – 2.0’ are included in the SPDX License List, I feel a need to also include the ‘‘Artistic License (Perl) – 1.0’. The ‘Artistic License (Perl) - 1.0’ contains an extra clause and is used in a wide range of PERL based programs. Discussed on 6/6 legal call: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Minutes/2013-06-06 |
| Zend Engine v2.0 | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc. |
| "old" MIT | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201 |
| Unlicense | Accepted in v1.19 | 2013-01-01 | see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal |
| US Gov't works | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler |
| GPL-2.0 identifier | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | issue of potential confusion with short identifier "GPL-2.0" meaning GPLv2 only; whereas GPLv2 or later, uses short identifier "GPL-2.0+" should short identifier be changed to "GPL-2.0-only" for symmetry and clarity?
|
| FLORA | Not Accepted | 2013-01-01 | decided not to add at this point in time, pending completion of license inclusion guidelines. see http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/month=20121101 for most recent thread on the topic and meeting minutes where discussed at: Legal_Team/Minutes/2012-10-31 |
| Unicode | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc. |
