THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2019-12-03"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
(→SPDX Document License) |
(→Attendees: add 2 attendees missed in original list.) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Nisha Kumar | * Nisha Kumar | ||
* Philippe Ombredanne | * Philippe Ombredanne | ||
+ | * Thomas Steenbergen | ||
+ | * Brad Edmondston | ||
==3.0 Model== | ==3.0 Model== |
Revision as of 19:38, 3 December 2019
December 3, 2019
Attendees
- Gary O’Neall
- Alexios Zavras
- Kate Stewart
- Jim Hutchinson
- Steve Winslow
- Matthew Crawford
- William Bartholomew
- Alan Tse
- Mark Atwood
- Rose Judge
- Nisha Kumar
- Philippe Ombredanne
- Thomas Steenbergen
- Brad Edmondston
3.0 Model
- Proposed update from William
- Came out of feedback from OMG group
- Feedback on current model:
- Exclusively focused on licensing and IP
- Not very approachable
- Different profiles for the different usages (e.g. IP, Security)
- Feedback: Change “Intellection Property” to “Licensing” for profile name
- Tooling – do we need to support all profiles?
- SPDX focused on syntax
- Producers and consumers have policies on what profiles are supported
- Discussion on Relationship – issue has already been added
- Discussion on FilesAnalyzed – William will add an issue to track
SPDX Document License
- We didn’t have a quorum to discuss completely
- Steve and Jilyane are researching the reasons for the mandatory DataLicense: CC0-1.0 declaration currently in use
- Request that those who would like it changed to document the reasons
- Philippe suggested that for some use cases where there is a contract in place between the supplier and consumer, the license for the SPDX document be in the license and not the document itself
- Steve will open an issue to track