THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2017-06-13"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
m (IT helpdesk team reviewing) |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*** Could provide some best practices and/or better documentation | *** Could provide some best practices and/or better documentation | ||
*** Proposal to have a default of “Document” since we have a namespace | *** Proposal to have a default of “Document” since we have a namespace | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]] | [[Category:Technical|Minutes]] | ||
[[Category:Minutes]] | [[Category:Minutes]] | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 13 July 2017
June 13, 2017
Attendees
- Gary O’Neall
- Thomas Steenberg
- Kate Stewart
- Anna Buhman
- Krys Nuvadga
- Alexios Zavras
- Yev Bronshteyn
- Uday Korlimarla
Spec Git Repository
- https://github.com/tsteenbe/spdx-spec
- Nearly complete
- Releases fixed
- History is in sync with the SPDX release dates
- Need to add contributing.md
- Worked needed for TravisCI
Next Release Project
- see https://github.com/tsteenbe/spdx-spec
- Discussion on optional fields
- Agree to make snippet byte range optional
- PackageLicenseDeclared
- Semantics different from other fields
- VerificationCode
- Discussed public repositories having a checksum already
^^^ Discussed whether required since file checksums are in the SPDX document – although there is also a proposal to not include all files in the SPDX document
- Tabled the discussion for now
- Document namespace – needed for external document references.
- Some confusion on how to apply – seems arbitrary
- Only requirement is that it is unique
- Agree to update the documentation and add best practices to describe this field more clearly
- Document name
- Required for the RDF model
- Could provide some best practices and/or better documentation
- Proposal to have a default of “Document” since we have a namespace
