THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/Minutes/2011-04-20"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <p> </p><p>SPDX Legal | + | <p> </p><p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p> </p><p>**</p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. </p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches. Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>***</p><p> </p> |
Revision as of 19:55, 16 December 2011
SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011
Attendees:
Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
Phil Odence (Blackduck)
Paul Madick (HP)
Kate Stewart (Canonical)
Michael Herzog (NexB)
Scott Peterson (HP)
Andy Wilson (Intel)
**
Minutes:
- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:
(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;
(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and
(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.
- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.
- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches. Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.
***