THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2015-12-08"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Snippets)
(AOB)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
==AOB==
 
==AOB==
* Bill:  Is there a 2.1 version of the SPEC started.
+
* Bill:  Is there a 2.1 version of the SPEC started?
 
* Kate:  Yes:  (looking up link after call - its:
 
* Kate:  Yes:  (looking up link after call - its:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wE_zvLU4c291ACi9wIJmQoE4ltKRW4rzM1TYiIvEVOs/edit)   
+
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wE_zvLU4c291ACi9wIJmQoE4ltKRW4rzM1TYiIvEVOs/edit)  
 +
    
 
Before adding snippets in to it,  would like to explore moving it to something that will work with git going forward.
 
Before adding snippets in to it,  would like to explore moving it to something that will work with git going forward.

Latest revision as of 20:00, 8 December 2015

December 8, 2015

Attendees

  • Gary O'Neall
  • Yev Bronshteyn
  • Bill Schineller
  • Kate Stewart
  • Scott Sterling
  • Hassib Khanafir
  • Mark Gisi

Prior Meetings

  • No minutes taken from last call on Nov 17, lack of quorum. Email of pending items sent out by Bill based on request from Mark.
  • No meetings on Nov 24 & Dec 2 due to Thanksgiving holidays.

Case Sensitivity

  • Discussed license expressions case sensitivity, and everyone basically agreed with conclusion from email thread ( Tools should not be sensitive to it, but the recommendation is to use upper and lower case to aid clarity.)

Snippets

  • Proposal located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/13OknzNnY56UZhnj_VVPatirBrNze5cWXDx2fnKbBI_g/edit#heading=h.nmf14n
  • AI: Gary to double check X.2 permits external file references.
  • AI: Yev to create draft of X.7 copyright text best practices note.
  • Reviewed X.8 - no concerns.
  • Reviewed X.9 - discussion on whether it should be name or snippetName. Consulted model and fileName and packageName exist - so decide on using snippetName for consistency. Note: Spec refers to name for package, but model has packageName - which could be confusing.
  • Resolved that Snippets can be basically considered ready for incorporation into SPEC as long as Gary doesn't have issues with X.2

AOB

  • Bill: Is there a 2.1 version of the SPEC started?
  • Kate: Yes: (looking up link after call - its:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wE_zvLU4c291ACi9wIJmQoE4ltKRW4rzM1TYiIvEVOs/edit)

Before adding snippets in to it, would like to explore moving it to something that will work with git going forward.