Difference between revisions of "General Meeting/Minutes/2010-12-16"

<p>&nbsp;</p><div style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; margin: 8px;"><p><strong>Administrative</strong></p><ul><li>Attendance - 12</li><li>Minutes from 2 Dec meeting approved</li></ul><p><strong>Technical Team Report</strong></p><ul><li>Still going back and forth on grammar and syntax, resolving RDF and tag value</li><li>Various proposals will be circulating</li><li>Next priority is defining a license template</li></ul><p><strong>Business Team Report</strong></p><ul><li>Beta program starting up. Aiming to start late Q1 and wrap in late Q2</li><li>Some tooling needs to be in place prior to make it easier to generate syntactically correct RDF as well as to create human readable format. Gary's 'pretty printer' is a good starting point</li><li>Ideally seeking pairs of supply chain partners for beta. Motorola and HP are interested. Maybe Fedora.</li><li>Ping KimW if interested or with ideas</li></ul><p><strong>Legal Team Report</strong></p><ul><li>Kicked of regular meetings.</li><li>First Meeting: successfully bridging from licensing sub-team to new Legal Team.&nbsp;Good discussion about handling GPL3 exceptions. Also about rev'ing license list. And what is "required" for valid SPDX</li><li>Much discussion about license list. Conclusion as that we should add a field to SPDX that specifies the version of the license list used to generate the file. The version number for the list will be date based. &nbsp;</li></ul><p><strong>Cross Functional Issues</strong></p><ul><li>Collaboration Summit. April 6-8, San Francisco<ul><li>Will be a compliance track on Thursday morning, the 7th including SPDX presentation</li><li>Tech Team will meet Thursday afternoon; Business Team, Friday morning</li><li>Legal Team may meet at Euro event or may try a teleconference</li></ul></li><li>Need folks to migrate to respective mailing lists.&nbsp;<ul><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">Current lists,&nbsp;</span><span style="font-size: 10px;">Technical- 10 (up 2), Business- 7 (up 1), Legal- 12 (up 5)</span></li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Action Items</strong></p><ul><li>Kate/Kim- Draft example for LF Member Counsel; include XML and spreadsheet. PENDING</li><li>Kate- Add back to Spec page in wiki preferred syntax for adding comments. DONE</li><li>MichaelH/Rockett- Write up and share postion on "reporting" vs. "interpreting. PENDING</li><li>GaryO- Post regular meeting times on Tech Team page. DONE</li><li>Rockett- Post regular meeting times on Legal Team page. PENDING</li><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. DONE, BUT LET'S KEEP UPDATING&nbsp;</li></ul><p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><ul><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Phil Odence, Black Duck Software</li><li>Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li>Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li>Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Esteban Rockett, Motorola</li><li>Michael Herzon, nexB</li><li>Pierre Lapointe, nexB</li></ul></div><p>&nbsp;</p>