THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Proposals/2010-10-21/Composite licensing"
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Status: draft | |
− | + | ==Issue== | |
− | + | There are some licensing scenarios which are not expressable in SPDX. For example, there is currently no way to express that a file can be used under the licenses A and B or A and C. | |
− | + | ==Use cases== | |
− | + | The set of use cases we need to be able to describe in SPDX is: | |
− | + | # a single license | |
+ | # choice of one from multiple single licenses | ||
+ | # multiple licenses (conjunctive) | ||
+ | # choice of one from multiple conjunctive license sets | ||
− | + | ==Proposal== | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | Introduce a license set concept to cover all these use cases. Specifically, a `ConjunctiveLicenseSet` and a `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`. Members of these types of sets would be of type `License`, `ConjunctiveLicenseSet` or `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`. This would allow composing licensing information in arbitrary conjunctive and disjunctive groupings. | |
− | + | The definition of `License` would not change. The `DeclaredLicense` and `DetectedLicense` properties would be updated to allow their value to be a `License`, `ConjunctiveLicenseSet`, or `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`. | |
− | + | ===Examples=== | |
− | + | ====Single license==== | |
− | < | + | <Package> |
+ | <DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> | ||
+ | </DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | </Package> | ||
− | + | ====Disjunctive licenses==== | |
− | < | + | <Package> |
+ | <DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:BSD" /> | ||
+ | </licenses> | ||
+ | </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | </DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | </Package> | ||
− | + | ====Complex disjunctive licenses==== | |
− | < | + | <Package> |
+ | <DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | <DisjuntiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> | ||
+ | <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:BSD" /> | ||
+ | </licenses> | ||
+ | </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> | ||
+ | <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:Apache" /> | ||
+ | </licenses> | ||
+ | </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | </licenses> | ||
+ | </DisjuntiveLicenseSet> | ||
+ | </DeclaredLicense> | ||
+ | </Package> | ||
+ | == Changes == | ||
− | + | These changes are available in the [https://github.com/pezra/spdx-spec/tree/compositeslicensing 'composite-licensing'] branch of https://github.com/pezra/spdx-spec.git. A full version of the spec with these changes is attached, as is a patch file to implement these changes. | |
− | + | [[Category:Technical]] |
Latest revision as of 11:23, 7 March 2013
Status: draft
Contents
Issue
There are some licensing scenarios which are not expressable in SPDX. For example, there is currently no way to express that a file can be used under the licenses A and B or A and C.
Use cases
The set of use cases we need to be able to describe in SPDX is:
- a single license
- choice of one from multiple single licenses
- multiple licenses (conjunctive)
- choice of one from multiple conjunctive license sets
Proposal
Introduce a license set concept to cover all these use cases. Specifically, a `ConjunctiveLicenseSet` and a `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`. Members of these types of sets would be of type `License`, `ConjunctiveLicenseSet` or `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`. This would allow composing licensing information in arbitrary conjunctive and disjunctive groupings.
The definition of `License` would not change. The `DeclaredLicense` and `DetectedLicense` properties would be updated to allow their value to be a `License`, `ConjunctiveLicenseSet`, or `DisjunctiveLicenseSet`.
Examples
Single license
<Package> <DeclaredLicense> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> </DeclaredLicense> </Package>
Disjunctive licenses
<Package> <DeclaredLicense> <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:BSD" /> </licenses> </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> </DeclaredLicense> </Package>
Complex disjunctive licenses
<Package> <DeclaredLicense> <DisjuntiveLicenseSet> <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:BSD" /> </licenses> </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> <ConjunctiveLicenseSet> <licenses rdf:parseType="Collection"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:GPL" /> <rdf:Description rdf:about="license:Apache" /> </licenses> </ConjunctiveLicenseSet> </licenses> </DisjuntiveLicenseSet> </DeclaredLicense> </Package>
Changes
These changes are available in the 'composite-licensing' branch of https://github.com/pezra/spdx-spec.git. A full version of the spec with these changes is attached, as is a patch file to implement these changes.