THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2020-06-09"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
(Created page with "June 9, 2020 == Attendees == * Kate Stewart * Jack Manbeck * John Mudge * Rex Jaeschke * 12066042189 * Brad Goldring * Emmanuel * Jilayne Lovejoy * Matija Suklje * Nisha Kumar...") |
(→Attendees) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Topics: | Topics: | ||
| − | Rex/John update on 2.2.1 | + | * Rex/John update on 2.2.1 |
| − | GSoC | + | * GSoC |
| − | SPDX | + | * SPDX Licensing Profile |
| − | + | ||
==SPDX 2.2.1== | ==SPDX 2.2.1== | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
* coding has started | * coding has started | ||
| − | ==Licensing Profile== | + | ==SPDX 3.0 Licensing Profile== |
* Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues | * Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues | ||
* Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385 | * Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385 | ||
| Line 45: | Line 44: | ||
** Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license | ** Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license | ||
** Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses | ** Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses | ||
| + | ** Vicky recommended that since the tool creators are requesting it, that should weigh in to the decision. | ||
** Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license | ** Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license | ||
| + | *** Kate agrees that clarity around roles is going to be needed | ||
* General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense | * General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense | ||
* Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion | * Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion | ||
Latest revision as of 23:36, 11 June 2020
June 9, 2020
Attendees
- Kate Stewart
- Jack Manbeck
- John Mudge
- Rex Jaeschke
- 12066042189
- Brad Goldring
- Emmanuel
- Jilayne Lovejoy
- Matija Suklje
- Nisha Kumar
- Peter Shin
- Rose Judge
- Santiago Torres
- Vicky Brasseur
- Gary O’Neall
- Mark Atwood
Topics:
- Rex/John update on 2.2.1
- GSoC
- SPDX Licensing Profile
SPDX 2.2.1
- Update from Rex
- 6 remaining issues
- Will be covered in a follow-up call with Kate. Any remaining issues will be brought to the group for next week
- Question on formatting for the headings and the links
- Jack, Kate, Thomas, Rex and John will discuss offline
- 6 remaining issues
GSoC
- coding has started
SPDX 3.0 Licensing Profile
- Meta issue #386 is tracking all the license profile related issues
- Consolidating issues for license profile issue #385
- Collection of fields for license
- Do we need a distributed license?
- Both Jilayne and Steve believe that concluded license can be used
- This was the original intent of concluded license
- Thomas expressed an interest in clearly declaring a non-disjunctive license at the point of distribution
- Different distributed licenses may be chosen for different customers
- Documentation currently doesn’t capture the disjunctive choice scenario for concluded license
- Concluded is currently used for both adding a reviewed conclusion on the license data and for the choice of disjunctive licenses
- Vicky recommended that since the tool creators are requesting it, that should weigh in to the decision.
- Brad suggested teasing apart the document creator and the artifact creator when defining distributed license
- Kate agrees that clarity around roles is going to be needed
- Both Jilayne and Steve believe that concluded license can be used
- General support for moving to 2 fields for every artifact DeclaredLicense and ConcludedLicense
- Use of the DistributedLicense needs more discussion
- Description of use cases for DistributedLicense
- Updated documentation for ConcludedLicense to include disjunctive choice
- Documentation on Artifact
Next Week’s Agenda
- 2.2.1 update
- GSoC
