THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2019-12-03"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
(Created page with "December 3, 2019 == Attendees == * Gary O’Neall * Alexios Zavras * Kate Stewart * Jim Hutchinson * Steve Winslow * Matthew Crawford * William Bartholomew * Alan Tse * Mark...") |
(→SPDX Document License) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==SPDX Document License== | ==SPDX Document License== | ||
* We didn’t have a quorum to discuss completely | * We didn’t have a quorum to discuss completely | ||
| − | * Steve and Jilyane are researching the reasons for the mandatory | + | * Steve and Jilyane are researching the reasons for the mandatory DataLicense: CC0-1.0 declaration currently in use |
* Request that those who would like it changed to document the reasons | * Request that those who would like it changed to document the reasons | ||
* Philippe suggested that for some use cases where there is a contract in place between the supplier and consumer, the license for the SPDX document be in the license and not the document itself | * Philippe suggested that for some use cases where there is a contract in place between the supplier and consumer, the license for the SPDX document be in the license and not the document itself | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 3 December 2019
December 3, 2019
Attendees
- Gary O’Neall
- Alexios Zavras
- Kate Stewart
- Jim Hutchinson
- Steve Winslow
- Matthew Crawford
- William Bartholomew
- Alan Tse
- Mark Atwood
- Rose Judge
- Nisha Kumar
- Philippe Ombredanne
3.0 Model
- Proposed update from William
- Came out of feedback from OMG group
- Feedback on current model:
- Exclusively focused on licensing and IP
- Not very approachable
- Different profiles for the different usages (e.g. IP, Security)
- Feedback: Change “Intellection Property” to “Licensing” for profile name
- Tooling – do we need to support all profiles?
- SPDX focused on syntax
- Producers and consumers have policies on what profiles are supported
- Discussion on Relationship – issue has already been added
- Discussion on FilesAnalyzed – William will add an issue to track
SPDX Document License
- We didn’t have a quorum to discuss completely
- Steve and Jilyane are researching the reasons for the mandatory DataLicense: CC0-1.0 declaration currently in use
- Request that those who would like it changed to document the reasons
- Philippe suggested that for some use cases where there is a contract in place between the supplier and consumer, the license for the SPDX document be in the license and not the document itself
- Steve will open an issue to track
