THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/License List/Licenses Under Consideration"
From SPDX Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We started tracking license requests in this table after release 1.18 of the License List. Entries submitted prior to that had their Date Submitted arbitrarily set to January 1, 2013. | We started tracking license requests in this table after release 1.18 of the License List. Entries submitted prior to that had their Date Submitted arbitrarily set to January 1, 2013. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| cellspacing=0 align=left valign=top cellpadding=5px style="background: lightyellow; border: 0px solid gray;" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! align=left style="background: lightyellow; border-bottom: 1px solid gray;" | Status Name !! align=left style="background: lightyellow; border-bottom: 1px solid gray;" | Explanation | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | width=15% valign=top | '''Accepted vX.yy''' || The license was added to the SPDX License List for the version indicated. The version indicated may be yet to be released in the case where a license is accepted in between SPDX License List releases. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''Under Review''' || A license addition has been requested and is currently under review. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | '''Not Accepted''' || The license was reviewed by the Legal Team and it was decided to not add the license to the SPDX License List at this time. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign=top |'''On Hold''' || This means that more research is needed or there are other extenuating factors that have prevented a decision on the addition of the license to be made. See the Notes for more information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | {| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | ||
| − | |+ Licenses Under Consideration | + | |+ |
| + | == Licenses Under Consideration == | ||
! align="left"| License | ! align="left"| License | ||
Revision as of 20:02, 5 June 2013
This table is used to track license list requests and is maintained by the Legal team.
We started tracking license requests in this table after release 1.18 of the License List. Entries submitted prior to that had their Date Submitted arbitrarily set to January 1, 2013.
| Status Name | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Accepted vX.yy | The license was added to the SPDX License List for the version indicated. The version indicated may be yet to be released in the case where a license is accepted in between SPDX License List releases. |
| Under Review | A license addition has been requested and is currently under review. |
| Not Accepted | The license was reviewed by the Legal Team and it was decided to not add the license to the SPDX License List at this time. |
| On Hold | This means that more research is needed or there are other extenuating factors that have prevented a decision on the addition of the license to be made. See the Notes for more information. |
| License | Status | Date Submitted | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zend Engine v2.0 | Under Review | 2013-01-01 | Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc. |
| "old" MIT | Under Review | 2013-01-01 | See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201 |
| Unlicense | Under Review | 2013-01-01 | see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal |
| US Gov't works | Under Review | 2013-01-01 | add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler |
| GPL-2.0 identifier | Under Review | 2013-01-01 | issue of potential confusion with short identifier "GPL-2.0" meaning GPLv2 only; whereas GPLv2 or later, uses short identifier "GPL-2.0+" should short identifier be changed to "GPL-2.0-only" for symmetry and clarity?
|
| FLORA | On Hold | 2013-01-01 | decided not to add at this point in time, pending completion of license inclusion guidelines. see http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/month=20121101 for most recent thread on the topic and meeting minutes where discussed at: Legal_Team/Minutes/2012-10-31 |
| Unicode | More Research Needed | 2013-01-01 | to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc. |
