THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/License List/Licenses Under Consideration"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Licenses to add?)
(Licenses to add?)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
! Date Submitted
 
! Date Submitted
 
! Who Submitted
 
! Who Submitted
! Worksheet
 
 
! Notes
 
! Notes
 
|-
 
|-
Line 16: Line 15:
 
| Under Review
 
| Under Review
 
|  
 
|  
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
| Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. '''more research needed''' to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
 
| Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. '''more research needed''' to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
Line 23: Line 21:
 
| Under Review
 
| Under Review
 
|
 
|
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
| See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201
 
| See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201
Line 29: Line 26:
 
| Unlicense
 
| Unlicense
 
| Under Review
 
| Under Review
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 37: Line 33:
 
| Under Review
 
| Under Review
 
|
 
|
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
| add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler
 
| add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler
Line 43: Line 38:
 
| GPL-2.0 identifier  
 
| GPL-2.0 identifier  
 
| Under Review
 
| Under Review
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 52: Line 46:
 
| FLORA  
 
| FLORA  
 
| On Hold
 
| On Hold
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
Line 59: Line 52:
 
| Unicode  
 
| Unicode  
 
| More Research Needed
 
| More Research Needed
|
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  

Revision as of 19:25, 5 June 2013

Licenses to add?

Licenses Under Consideration
License Status Date Submitted Who Submitted Notes
Zend Engine v2.0 Under Review Unicode License Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license (for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.
"old" MIT Under Review See http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/day=20121201
Unlicense Under Review see thread here: http://search.gmane.org/?query=unlicenseamp group=gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal
US Gov't works Under Review add short identifier to list; see email from David Wheeler
GPL-2.0 identifier Under Review issue of potential confusion with short identifier "GPL-2.0" meaning GPLv2 only; whereas GPLv2 or later, uses short identifier "GPL-2.0+" should short identifier be changed to "GPL-2.0-only" for symmetry and clarity?
  1. what would the ramifications of changing a short identifier be? had said we wouldn't not change short identifiers
  2. alternatively, could add in Notes field for all GNU licenses that short identifier "GPL-2.0" = GPL v2 only for clarification (but will this be "obvious" enough?
FLORA On Hold decided not to add at this point in time, pending completion of license inclusion guidelines. see http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.licenses.spdx.legal/month=20121101 for most recent thread on the topic and meeting minutes where discussed at: Legal_Team/Minutes/2012-10-31
Unicode More Research Needed to add? (from FSF list) - Unicode LIcense Agreement for Data Files and Software – are there other versions or other Unicode licenses? It does not appear so, based on the info on this page: http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ... → realized that Fedora has a different Unicode license(for Character Database, Fedora uses short identifier: UCD, found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD?rd=Licensing/UCD ) than the Unicode license above from the FSF list. more research needed to see if there are others, so can appropriately name, etc.