THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/Minutes/2012-11-13"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p>Attendees:</p><ul><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Micro Focus</li><li>Paul Madick, HP</li><li>Tom Vidal</li></ul><p>Agenda:</p><p>1) couple quick updates:</p><ul><li>distributed draft of guildelines for types of licenses to be included (or not included on License List). &nbsp;Tom Vidal drafted first round with Tom Incorvia and Jilayne reviewing. &nbsp;</li><li>responded to Roger Meier re: Flora license request</li><li>have not responded to Roger's suggestion re: moving License List to Git (Jilayne to address this)</li></ul><p>2) Discussion re: draft license guidelines</p><ul><li>focusing on list of characteristics: &nbsp;Vidal explained how he came up with factors - not a set of six, but more like a list of possibilities, how does a license rank on these factors (may not necessarily be mandatory)</li><ul><li>"provides access to source code" is probably right, but example, re: requiring distribution of source code is not always the case. maybe change language in lead-in to explain this, maybe even use IRS analogy</li><li>maybe change to description of broad grant of rights; source code accessible. &nbsp;</li><li>discussion on how to capture "direct license" concept as factor</li><li>(see edits in document)</li><li>Tom V. to take edits and provide another revision for next call</li></ul></ul><p>3) we need more people attending these calls...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
 +
* Tom Incorvia, Micro Focus
 +
* Paul Madick, HP
 +
* Tom Vidal
 +
 
 +
== couple quick updates ==
 +
 
 +
* distributed draft of guildelines for types of licenses to be included (or not included on License List). Tom Vidal drafted first round with Tom Incorvia and Jilayne reviewing.
 +
* responded to Roger Meier re: Flora license request
 +
* have not responded to Roger's suggestion re: moving License List to Git (Jilayne to address this)
 +
 
 +
== Discussion re: draft license guidelines ==
 +
 
 +
* focusing on list of characteristics: Vidal explained how he came up with factors - not a set of six, but more like a list of possibilities, how does a license rank on these factors (may not necessarily be mandatory)
 +
** "provides access to source code" is probably right, but example, re: requiring distribution of source code is not always the case. maybe change language in lead-in to explain this, maybe even use IRS analogy
 +
** maybe change to description of broad grant of rights; source code accessible.
 +
** discussion on how to capture "direct license" concept as factor
 +
** (see edits in document - included below with track changes from today's call.)
 +
** Tom V. to take edits and provide another revision for next call
 +
 
 +
== Final remark ==
 +
 
 +
we need more people attending these calls...
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Legal|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 17:50, 5 March 2013

Attendees

  • Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
  • Tom Incorvia, Micro Focus
  • Paul Madick, HP
  • Tom Vidal

couple quick updates

  • distributed draft of guildelines for types of licenses to be included (or not included on License List). Tom Vidal drafted first round with Tom Incorvia and Jilayne reviewing.
  • responded to Roger Meier re: Flora license request
  • have not responded to Roger's suggestion re: moving License List to Git (Jilayne to address this)

Discussion re: draft license guidelines

  • focusing on list of characteristics: Vidal explained how he came up with factors - not a set of six, but more like a list of possibilities, how does a license rank on these factors (may not necessarily be mandatory)
    • "provides access to source code" is probably right, but example, re: requiring distribution of source code is not always the case. maybe change language in lead-in to explain this, maybe even use IRS analogy
    • maybe change to description of broad grant of rights; source code accessible.
    • discussion on how to capture "direct license" concept as factor
    • (see edits in document - included below with track changes from today's call.)
    • Tom V. to take edits and provide another revision for next call

Final remark

we need more people attending these calls...

Retrieved from "https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=Legal_Team/Minutes/2012-11-13&oldid=2263"