THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Proposals/SPDX 2.0 Model Proposals"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <p> </p><p>This page brings together various modelling proposals for 2.0 under a common page. The models currently under discusson are shown below with a brief | + | <p> </p><p>This page brings together various modelling proposals for 2.0 under a common page. The models currently under discusson are shown below with a brief excerpt from the page:</p><p> </p><p>1. <a title="Rough Conceptual Model" href="http://spdx.org/wiki/yet-another-rough-proposal-conceptual-model-spdx-2%20">Rough Conceptual Model</a></p><p>"This conceptual model is an attempt to incrementally add hierarchy and provenance capabilities to the existing SPDX model. Many of the <a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases">use cases</a> have been considered but further analysis is necessary to ensure that this model covers all scenarios. ..."</p><p> </p><p>2. <a title="Supply Chain Model" href="http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20">Provenance and Supply Chain Model </a></p><p>" A desire has been expressed to be able to have SPDX be capable of expressing</p><ol><li><a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/sdpx-20-provenance">Provenance</a> (we can know precisely who said what and when about a package)</li><li>Hiearchy and Aggregation ( package A contains packages B, C, etc)</li><li>How software flows through a supply chain (upstream to packager, through several intermediate vendors to consumer) ..."</li></ol><p> </p><p>3. <a title="Merged Model Proposal" href="http://www.spdx.org/wiki/2012-feb-1-merged-model-proposal">Merged Model Proposal</a></p><p>"Below is a class diagram merging Ed Warnicke's proposed SPDX Element model with the 1.0 model. Definately a work in progress. Most of the class definitions can be found in the 1.0 spec in the RDF appendix (model) or in Ed's proposal (<a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20">http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20</a>).</p><p>The goals of this proposal are to:</p><p>- Support the use cases for the 1.0 spec</p><p>- Support the supply chain use cases</p><p>- Support the "hierarchical" or embedded package use cases</p><p>- Provide a more abstract model which can simplify the application of SPDX to some of the more complex use cases ... "</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> |
Revision as of 19:13, 21 August 2012
This page brings together various modelling proposals for 2.0 under a common page. The models currently under discusson are shown below with a brief excerpt from the page:
1. <a title="Rough Conceptual Model" href="http://spdx.org/wiki/yet-another-rough-proposal-conceptual-model-spdx-2%20">Rough Conceptual Model</a>
"This conceptual model is an attempt to incrementally add hierarchy and provenance capabilities to the existing SPDX model. Many of the <a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases">use cases</a> have been considered but further analysis is necessary to ensure that this model covers all scenarios. ..."
2. <a title="Supply Chain Model" href="http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20">Provenance and Supply Chain Model </a>
" A desire has been expressed to be able to have SPDX be capable of expressing
- <a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/sdpx-20-provenance">Provenance</a> (we can know precisely who said what and when about a package)
- Hiearchy and Aggregation ( package A contains packages B, C, etc)
- How software flows through a supply chain (upstream to packager, through several intermediate vendors to consumer) ..."
3. <a title="Merged Model Proposal" href="http://www.spdx.org/wiki/2012-feb-1-merged-model-proposal">Merged Model Proposal</a>
"Below is a class diagram merging Ed Warnicke's proposed SPDX Element model with the 1.0 model. Definately a work in progress. Most of the class definitions can be found in the 1.0 spec in the RDF appendix (model) or in Ed's proposal (<a href="http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20">http://spdx.org/wiki/rough-proposal-hierarchy-signing-and-supply-chain-friendliness-spdx-20</a>).
The goals of this proposal are to:
- Support the use cases for the 1.0 spec
- Support the supply chain use cases
- Support the "hierarchical" or embedded package use cases
- Provide a more abstract model which can simplify the application of SPDX to some of the more complex use cases ... "