THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2012-01-31"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 1/31/2012</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Attendees:</span></p><ul><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Gary O’Neall</span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Bill Schineller</span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Ed Warnicke</span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Steve Crawford</span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Rana Rahal<em></em></span></span></li><li>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Jack Manbeck</span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Peter Williams</span></span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agenda:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on SPDX package definitions</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Package definitions:</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Start with Wiki’s definitions</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kate proposed any collection of files</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Jack’s proposal – unit of delivery of software files</span></p><ul><li>&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">What is a “unit” of delivery, over time one unit of delivery may not be a unit of delivery later in the supply chain</span></li><li>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on package/subpackage supply chain model [manufacturing analogy]</span></li><li>&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Different between unit of consumption vs. unit of delivery</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">The current RDF Package definition could be used</span></p><ul><li>&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on if a single file could be both a package and not a package</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">“whatever” represent a collection of files made available for use</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agreed on the usefulness of a definition “’whatever’ represent a collection of files made available for use</span></p><ul><li>&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">The “whatever” term will be replaced with an agreed upon term (TBD)</span></li><li>&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Follow-up on possibly further defining “made available for use”</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">&nbsp;</span></p>
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Gary O’Neall
 +
* Bill Schineller
 +
* Kirsten Newcomer
 +
* Ed Warnicke
 +
* Steve Cropper
 +
* Rana Rahal''''
 +
* Jack Manbeck
 +
* Peter Williams
 +
 
 +
== Agenda ==
 +
 
 +
* Discussion on SPDX package definitions
 +
* Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)
 +
 
 +
== Package definitions ==
 +
 
 +
* Start with Wiki’s definitions
 +
* Kate proposed any collection of files
 +
* Jack’s proposal – unit of delivery of software files
 +
** What is a “unit” of delivery, over time one unit of delivery may not be a unit of delivery later in the supply chain
 +
** Discussion on package/subpackage supply chain model (manufacturing analogy)
 +
** Different between unit of consumption vs. unit of delivery
 +
* The current RDF Package definition could be used
 +
* * Discussion on if a single file could be both a package and not a package
 +
* Agreed on the usefulness of a definition “{} represent a collection of one or more files that are delivered as a unit" vs "A package represents a collection of software files that are delivered as a single functional component" from http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package
 +
 
 +
* The “{}” term will be replaced with an agreed upon term (TBD)
 +
* Follow-up on possibly further defining “delivered as a unit”
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 13:58, 6 March 2013

Attendees

  • Gary O’Neall
  • Bill Schineller
  • Kirsten Newcomer
  • Ed Warnicke
  • Steve Cropper
  • Rana Rahal'
  • Jack Manbeck
  • Peter Williams

Agenda

  • Discussion on SPDX package definitions
  • Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)

Package definitions

  • Start with Wiki’s definitions
  • Kate proposed any collection of files
  • Jack’s proposal – unit of delivery of software files
    • What is a “unit” of delivery, over time one unit of delivery may not be a unit of delivery later in the supply chain
    • Discussion on package/subpackage supply chain model (manufacturing analogy)
    • Different between unit of consumption vs. unit of delivery
  • The current RDF Package definition could be used
  • * Discussion on if a single file could be both a package and not a package
  • Agreed on the usefulness of a definition “{} represent a collection of one or more files that are delivered as a unit" vs "A package represents a collection of software files that are delivered as a single functional component" from http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package
  • The “{}” term will be replaced with an agreed upon term (TBD)
  • Follow-up on possibly further defining “delivered as a unit”