THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2011-08-09"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | == Attendees == | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | * Bill Schineller | |
| − | + | * Kirsten Newcomer | |
| − | + | * Branden Robinson | |
| + | * Peter Williams | ||
| + | * Gary O’Neall | ||
| + | * Kate Stewart | ||
| + | * Nicholaas Loke | ||
| + | * Jack Manbeck | ||
| + | * Marshal | ||
| + | == Agenda == | ||
| + | * Open bug list review | ||
| + | * Spec walkthrough/check for ambiguities | ||
| + | == Review open bug list == | ||
| + | * 887 - Do we have structured strings for creator, reviewer, …? Agreed that in the future, the RDF structure will probably be different than a structured string but we do not have time to create, review and implement a proposal. Agreed to have a structured string for this release – Peter will propose a more formal syntax. Note: SPDX tools currently doea a simple partial validation of strings starting with “PERSON:”, “ORGANIZATION:”, etc. | ||
| + | * 728 - Move examples to spdx.org – leave in spdx.org/spec/examples – Kirsten will create subcatory for “work in progress”, once reviewed we can label the examples as conforming to the spec. Can close bug. | ||
| + | * Xxx – What license is the RDF terms released under, need to confirm with legal. Peter will follow-up with legal. Proposal to make the rdf spec | ||
| + | * 874 – packageOriginator and packageSuppler → originator, supplier – spec is being updated. Tools will be updated and re-uploaded this morning to make consistent. | ||
| + | * Suggest that the class order in the rdf terms page match the order from the spec | ||
| + | * 656 – closed after review of license text and license index | ||
| + | * 883 – agree we don’t need ascending order for license ID’s – assigned bug to Kate and will e fixed in next rev of the spec | ||
| + | * 886 – broken link, assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release | ||
| + | * 888 – rdf example fix - assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release | ||
| + | == Walkthrough of spec changes == | ||
| + | * Reviewed updates (a few changes were noted “spdx.com” → “spdx.org”) | ||
| + | * Request to make sections 5 and 6 consistent in the statement for what is required and optional – Steve to send an email describing request to the group | ||
| + | * Decided to change the status of the rdf terms from “testing” to “stable” | ||
| + | == Other status == | ||
| − | + | * RDF terms will be updated by this afternoon (Peter) | |
| − | + | * Gary will review the doc, rdf terms, and tool property values for consistency | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Technical|Minutes]] | |
| − | + | [[Category:Minutes]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 13:17, 6 March 2013
Attendees
- Bill Schineller
- Kirsten Newcomer
- Branden Robinson
- Peter Williams
- Gary O’Neall
- Kate Stewart
- Nicholaas Loke
- Jack Manbeck
- Marshal
Agenda
- Open bug list review
- Spec walkthrough/check for ambiguities
Review open bug list
- 887 - Do we have structured strings for creator, reviewer, …? Agreed that in the future, the RDF structure will probably be different than a structured string but we do not have time to create, review and implement a proposal. Agreed to have a structured string for this release – Peter will propose a more formal syntax. Note: SPDX tools currently doea a simple partial validation of strings starting with “PERSON:”, “ORGANIZATION:”, etc.
- 728 - Move examples to spdx.org – leave in spdx.org/spec/examples – Kirsten will create subcatory for “work in progress”, once reviewed we can label the examples as conforming to the spec. Can close bug.
- Xxx – What license is the RDF terms released under, need to confirm with legal. Peter will follow-up with legal. Proposal to make the rdf spec
- 874 – packageOriginator and packageSuppler → originator, supplier – spec is being updated. Tools will be updated and re-uploaded this morning to make consistent.
- Suggest that the class order in the rdf terms page match the order from the spec
- 656 – closed after review of license text and license index
- 883 – agree we don’t need ascending order for license ID’s – assigned bug to Kate and will e fixed in next rev of the spec
- 886 – broken link, assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release
- 888 – rdf example fix - assigned to Kate, will be fixed in next release
Walkthrough of spec changes
- Reviewed updates (a few changes were noted “spdx.com” → “spdx.org”)
- Request to make sections 5 and 6 consistent in the statement for what is required and optional – Steve to send an email describing request to the group
- Decided to change the status of the rdf terms from “testing” to “stable”
Other status
- RDF terms will be updated by this afternoon (Peter)
- Gary will review the doc, rdf terms, and tool property values for consistency
