THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2011-07-28"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p>Minutes 7/28/2011</p>
+
== Attendees ==
  
−
<p>Attendees:</p><ul><li>Kirsten Newcomer</li><li>Branden Robinson</li><li>Peter Williams</li><li>Kate Stewart</li><li>Steve Cropper</li><li>Jack Manbeck</li></ul>
+
* Kirsten Newcomer
 +
* Branden Robinson
 +
* Peter Williams
 +
* Kate Stewart
 +
* Steve Cropper
 +
* Jack Manbeck
  
−
<p>Agenda:</p>
+
== Agenda ==
  
−
<ul><li>Discuss proposal from Steve Cropper for Supplier related fields</li><li>Review open bugs</li></ul><p>The team had a good discussion about the new proposed Supplier fields, including discussion of:</p><ul><li>Optional vs. Mandatory</li><li>Reasons for including in GA of 1.0 rather than waiting</li><li>Overlap with need for handling package hierarchies</li><li>Affect on tools<ul><li>suggested that tools could be udpated after GA date</li></ul></li><li>Use cases, including<ul><li>open source package maintained by loose coalition where no individual has clear ownership</li><li>open source package where original copyright owner has died</li><li>package shared between supply chain partners</li><li>Discussed providing special options as we do for certain other fields such as NOASSERTION, NONE, and possibly ORPHANED</li></ul></li></ul><p>Spec update</p><ul><li>waiting for trademark info from Rockett</li><li>waiting for input from Karen C. on confidentiality </li></ul><p>Bug review</p><p>We ran out of time to review the bug list, but ask that everyone</p><ul><li>review for any open P1s assigned to them</li><li>review closed bugs to be sure we're in agreement </li></ul><p>Corrections, additions welcome.</p>
+
* Discuss proposal from Steve Cropper for Supplier related fields
 +
* Review open bugs
 +
 
 +
== Supplier fields ==
 +
 
 +
The team had a good discussion about the new proposed Supplier fields, including discussion of:
 +
 
 +
* Optional vs. Mandatory
 +
* Reasons for including in GA of 1.0 rather than waiting
 +
* Overlap with need for handling package hierarchies
 +
* Affect on tools
 +
** suggested that tools could be udpated after GA date
 +
* Use cases, including
 +
** open source package maintained by loose coalition where no individual has clear ownership
 +
** open source package where original copyright owner has died
 +
** package shared between supply chain partners
 +
** Discussed providing special options as we do for certain other fields such as NOASSERTION, NONE, and possibly ORPHANED
 +
 
 +
== Spec update ==
 +
 
 +
* waiting for trademark info from Rockett
 +
* waiting for input from Karen C. on confidentiality
 +
 
 +
== Bug review ==
 +
 
 +
We ran out of time to review the bug list, but ask that everyone
 +
 
 +
* review for any open P1s assigned to them
 +
* review closed bugs to be sure we're in agreement
 +
 
 +
Corrections, additions welcome.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 13:14, 6 March 2013

Attendees

  • Kirsten Newcomer
  • Branden Robinson
  • Peter Williams
  • Kate Stewart
  • Steve Cropper
  • Jack Manbeck

Agenda

  • Discuss proposal from Steve Cropper for Supplier related fields
  • Review open bugs

Supplier fields

The team had a good discussion about the new proposed Supplier fields, including discussion of:

  • Optional vs. Mandatory
  • Reasons for including in GA of 1.0 rather than waiting
  • Overlap with need for handling package hierarchies
  • Affect on tools
    • suggested that tools could be udpated after GA date
  • Use cases, including
    • open source package maintained by loose coalition where no individual has clear ownership
    • open source package where original copyright owner has died
    • package shared between supply chain partners
    • Discussed providing special options as we do for certain other fields such as NOASSERTION, NONE, and possibly ORPHANED

Spec update

  • waiting for trademark info from Rockett
  • waiting for input from Karen C. on confidentiality

Bug review

We ran out of time to review the bug list, but ask that everyone

  • review for any open P1s assigned to them
  • review closed bugs to be sure we're in agreement

Corrections, additions welcome.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=Technical_Team/Minutes/2011-07-28&oldid=1211"