THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "General Meeting/Minutes/2011-06-16"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p>Attendance: 11<br />Minutes for 20110602 approved<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /><strong>Technical Team Report - Kate<br /></strong></p><ul><li>Tools: Updating tools as needed</li><li>Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec</li><li>Spec: Have had interesting discussions with Cisco about mapping SPDX to their current process. Expect that new fields and possibly new models will come out of this discussion</li><li>Beta feedback: Looking for place to collect/present feedback. Would like to be sure we capture feedback even for items we've resolved. Kim plans to create wiki page.</li></ul>
+
* Attendance: 11
 +
* Minutes for 20110602 approved
  
−
<p><strong>Business Team Report - Kim</strong></p>
+
== Technical Team Report - Kate ==
−
<ul><li>Beta program:<br /><ul><li>HP/WindRiver &amp; OL/Antelink continue to make progress</li><li>Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear</li><li>There's been some confusion over license fields at package level. A wiki discussion on this topic can be found here: http://spdx.org/wiki/license-field-discussion</li></ul></li><li>GA Launch:<ul><li>Continue to work to get ready for launch at LinuxCon NA in mid-August</li></ul></li></ul>
+
  
−
<p><strong>Legal Team Report - In absentia<br /></strong></p>
+
* Tools: Updating tools as needed
−
<ul><li>All legal team members are at a separate face-to-face meeting and unable to attend this meeting</li></ul>
+
* Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec
 +
* Spec: Have had interesting discussions with Cisco about mapping SPDX to their current process. Expect that new fields and possibly new models will come out of this discussion
 +
* Beta feedback: Looking for place to collect/present feedback. Would like to be sure we capture feedback even for items we've resolved. Kim plans to create wiki page.
  
−
<p><strong>Cross Functional Issues – Discussion</strong></p>
+
== Business Team Report - Kim ==
−
<ul><li>Website update- Kirsten
+
−
<ul><li>Working on mind-maps for proposed flow; plan to present more generally in next few weeks</li><li>Logistical question from Kim: should we remove or archive older content? <br /><ul><li>Both options are available; deleting won't create orphaned pages</li><li>Will likely decide on case-by-case basis</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Package License fields - Postponed until next meeting since legal team not present this week</li></ul>
+
  
−
<p><strong>Open Action Items</strong></p>
+
* Beta program:
−
<ul><li>MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING</li><li>Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly</li><li>Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration</li><li>Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule</li><li>?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: <a title="http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq" href="wiki/draft-spdx-faq">http://spdx.org/wiki/draft-spdx-faq</a></li></ul><p class="p1"><strong>Attendees</strong></p>
+
** HP/WindRiver &amp; OL/Antelink continue to make progress
−
<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Peter Williams, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Martin Michlmayr, HP</li><li>Kate Stewart, Canonical</li><li>Brandon Robinson, Cisco</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation</li><li>Juergen Weigert, SuSE</li></ul>
+
** Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear
 +
** There's been some confusion over license fields at package level. A wiki discussion on this topic can be found here: [[General_Meeting/License_Field_Discussion]]
 +
* GA Launch:
 +
** Continue to work to get ready for launch at LinuxCon NA in mid-August
 +
 
 +
== Legal Team Report - In absentia ==
 +
 
 +
* All legal team members are at a separate face-to-face meeting and unable to attend this meeting
 +
 
 +
== Cross Functional Issues – Discussion ==
 +
 
 +
* Website update- Kirsten
 +
** Working on mind-maps for proposed flow; plan to present more generally in next few weeks
 +
** Logistical question from Kim: should we remove or archive older content?
 +
*** Both options are available; deleting won't create orphaned pages
 +
*** Will likely decide on case-by-case basis
 +
* Package License fields - Postponed until next meeting since legal team not present this week
 +
 
 +
== Open Action Items ==
 +
 
 +
* MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING
 +
* Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly
 +
* Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration
 +
* Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule
 +
* ?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: [[SPDX_FAQ]]
 +
 
 +
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software
 +
* Kim Weins, OpenLogic
 +
* Peter Williams, OpenLogic
 +
* Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software
 +
* Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
 +
* Martin Michlmayr, HP
 +
* Kate Stewart, Canonical
 +
* Brandon Robinson, Cisco
 +
* Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
 +
* Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation
 +
* Juergen Weigert, SuSE
 +
 
 +
[[Category:General|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 11:23, 6 March 2013

  • Attendance: 11
  • Minutes for 20110602 approved

Technical Team Report - Kate

  • Tools: Updating tools as needed
  • Spec: Working minor changes to June 5 version of the spec
  • Spec: Have had interesting discussions with Cisco about mapping SPDX to their current process. Expect that new fields and possibly new models will come out of this discussion
  • Beta feedback: Looking for place to collect/present feedback. Would like to be sure we capture feedback even for items we've resolved. Kim plans to create wiki page.

Business Team Report - Kim

  • Beta program:
    • HP/WindRiver & OL/Antelink continue to make progress
    • Motorola/TI progress is not yet clear
    • There's been some confusion over license fields at package level. A wiki discussion on this topic can be found here: General_Meeting/License_Field_Discussion
  • GA Launch:
    • Continue to work to get ready for launch at LinuxCon NA in mid-August

Legal Team Report - In absentia

  • All legal team members are at a separate face-to-face meeting and unable to attend this meeting

Cross Functional Issues – Discussion

  • Website update- Kirsten
    • Working on mind-maps for proposed flow; plan to present more generally in next few weeks
    • Logistical question from Kim: should we remove or archive older content?
      • Both options are available; deleting won't create orphaned pages
      • Will likely decide on case-by-case basis
  • Package License fields - Postponed until next meeting since legal team not present this week

Open Action Items

  • MartinM- Report back on # of people on respective mailing lists. ONGOING
  • Kim -- share Biz Team proposed process for adding licenses to SPDX list more broadly
  • Michael H. -- provide info on existing BOM standards that should be useful for future consideration
  • Legal/Biz Teams- Review and update Master Schedule
  •  ?? -- volunteers needed to review and update the FAQ: SPDX_FAQ

Attendees

  • Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck Software
  • Kim Weins, OpenLogic
  • Peter Williams, OpenLogic
  • Bill Schineller, Black Duck Software
  • Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
  • Martin Michlmayr, HP
  • Kate Stewart, Canonical
  • Brandon Robinson, Cisco
  • Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
  • Phil Koltun, Linux Foundation
  • Juergen Weigert, SuSE
Retrieved from "https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=General_Meeting/Minutes/2011-06-16&oldid=1178"