THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Field Names"
Bschineller (Talk | contribs) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 19:04, 15 March 2011
Field names have drifted, this is to capture comments and harmonize between the formats.
3.9 Do we need this? All the files in the package should have relationships to licensing information they contains
3.10 We might want reserve "copyrightDeclared" for the future where we have a more robust copyright model. We could change this to "copyrightStatement" which implies that is it is just some text.
4.1 This is the uri/node id of the resource so it is no necessary to have a separate property for it in rdf.
5.1 This is the uri/node id of the resource so it is no necessary to have a separate property for it in rdf.
5.8 In rdf only one property is required to store the artifact of information.
6.1 Should this field be called "analysisAcceptedBy" to be clear about the semantics of this field?
6.3 Maybe "notes" rather than "comment" makes more sense for this field.
?.? spds:Tool (class) - when is this proposed to be used?
spdx:version - should match earlier references and syntax
