THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Legal Team/Templatizing/ReviewXML"
From SPDX Wiki
< Legal Team | Templatizing
(→Process for Review) |
(→Process for Review) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* if you find a license that has acknowledgment text, then label it with "has acknowledgement" - for example see: | * if you find a license that has acknowledgment text, then label it with "has acknowledgement" - for example see: | ||
* use ... define these?? | * use ... define these?? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * If you have approved the content, but otherwise approved, use "approved" label | ||
+ | * If the license is good to go, then click on the "merge pull request" and you're done! |
Revision as of 19:49, 25 April 2016
Plan for review of XML license file
The files can be found here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML
You will need to have a Github account to participate in the review. Let Jilayne know your Github account ID to be added to the repository team.
Key things to review before reviewing the XML files:
- SPDX License List Matching Guidelines: http://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/license-list-overview
- Explanation of the SPDX License List fields: http://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/license-list-overview (at bottom of page)
- Description of current proposal and XML tags: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Templatizing/tags-matching
Watch the following videos that Kris made for an illustration of our review process:
- Review process: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_VoRQbDyEc
- Using Git: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsSjT4cmVEc
Key things to look at during review:
- identify which parts of the license template are important or unimportant for purposes of matching (as per the Matching Guidelines)
- structural components - ensuring we have groups of clauses correctly identified (automated process takes care of most of this, but sanity check)
- consider any changes that need to be made to the Matching Guidelines or License List Overview/description of fields
Process for Review
Labels created in Github: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/labels
- if you find a license that has acknowledgment text, then label it with "has acknowledgement" - for example see:
- use ... define these??
- If you have approved the content, but otherwise approved, use "approved" label
- If the license is good to go, then click on the "merge pull request" and you're done!