THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Business Team/Minutes/2011-06-09"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><ul><li>Kim Weins</li><li>Pierre Lapointe</li><li>Phil Odence</li><li>Gary O'Neall</li><li>Mark Gisi</li></ul><p><strong>Agenda</strong></p><ul><li>Beta Updates</li><li>Web Site Review</li><li>Discuss upcoming events</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Minutes</strong></p><ul><li>Beta Sites</li><li></li></ul>
+
<p><strong>Attendees</strong></p><ul><li>Kim Weins</li><li>Pierre Lapointe</li><li>Phil Odence</li><li>Gary O'Neall</li><li>Mark Gisi</li><li>Kate Stewart</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy</li><li>Steve Cropper</li></ul><p><strong>Agenda</strong></p><ul><li>Beta Updates</li><li>Web Site Review</li><li>Update on spec</li></ul><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Minutes</strong></p><ul><li>Beta Sites<ul><li>Antelink - OpenLogic - OpenLogic is producing files. &nbsp; On track to finish end of June.</li><li>WindRiver - HP&nbsp; -&nbsp; Got the tooling to work (some questions re error messages).&nbsp; Sent the file over and HP was able to review for first package (30 files).&nbsp; Now going to do zlib.&nbsp; Then will do BusyBox and OpenSSL.<ul><li>Some confusion about fitting things in the SPDX package licenses field (declared and concluded licenses for the package).&nbsp; It's hard to say that there is a single license at the package level.&nbsp; Mark thinks that declared license is what people "view" the package as.</li><li>According to Kate -- <ul><li>Declared - what the project says (like in the Copying file)</li><li>All Licenses in Files -- Laundry list of any license detected in file</li><li>Concluded -- what the analyzer concludes - can have ands and ors</li></ul></li><li>Clearly there is still a lot of confusion about these license fields at the package level. </li><li>Kate -asked everybody to read the latest spec to see if it is clear.</li><li></li></ul></li><li></li></ul></li><li>Update on spec -- new draft of spec up there -- needs review</li></ul>

Revision as of 15:30, 9 June 2011

Attendees

  • Kim Weins
  • Pierre Lapointe
  • Phil Odence
  • Gary O'Neall
  • Mark Gisi
  • Kate Stewart
  • Jilayne Lovejoy
  • Steve Cropper

Agenda

  • Beta Updates
  • Web Site Review
  • Update on spec

 

Minutes

  • Beta Sites
    • Antelink - OpenLogic - OpenLogic is producing files.   On track to finish end of June.
    • WindRiver - HP  -  Got the tooling to work (some questions re error messages).  Sent the file over and HP was able to review for first package (30 files).  Now going to do zlib.  Then will do BusyBox and OpenSSL.
      • Some confusion about fitting things in the SPDX package licenses field (declared and concluded licenses for the package).  It's hard to say that there is a single license at the package level.  Mark thinks that declared license is what people "view" the package as.
      • According to Kate --
        • Declared - what the project says (like in the Copying file)
        • All Licenses in Files -- Laundry list of any license detected in file
        • Concluded -- what the analyzer concludes - can have ands and ors
      • Clearly there is still a lot of confusion about these license fields at the package level.
      • Kate -asked everybody to read the latest spec to see if it is clear.
  • Update on spec -- new draft of spec up there -- needs review
Retrieved from "https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=Business_Team/Minutes/2011-06-09&oldid=1157"