THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2012-01-31"
From SPDX Wiki
< Technical Team | Minutes
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 1/31/2012</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Attendees:</span></p><ul><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Gary O’Neall</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Bill Schineller</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Ed Warnicke</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Steve | + | <p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 1/31/2012</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Attendees:</span></p><ul><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Gary O’Neall</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Bill Schineller</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Ed Warnicke</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Steve Cropper</span></li><li> <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Rana Rahal<em></em></span></span></li><li> <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Jack Manbeck</span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"> Peter Williams</span></span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agenda:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on SPDX package definitions</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Package definitions:</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Start with Wiki’s definitions</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kate proposed any collection of files</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Jack’s proposal – unit of delivery of software files</span></p><ul><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">What is a “unit” of delivery, over time one unit of delivery may not be a unit of delivery later in the supply chain</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on package/subpackage supply chain model [manufacturing analogy]</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Different between unit of consumption vs. unit of delivery</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">The current RDF Package definition could be used</span></p><ul><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on if a single file could be both a package and not a package</span></li></ul><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">-</span> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agreed on the usefulness of a definition “{} represent a collection of one or more files that are delivered as a unit" vs "A package represents a collection of software files that are delivered as a single functional component" from <a href="http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package">http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package</a></span></p><ul><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">The “{}” term will be replaced with an agreed upon term (TBD)</span></li><li> <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Follow-up on possibly further defining “delivered as a unit”</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;"> </span></p> |
Revision as of 19:10, 7 February 2012
Minutes 1/31/2012
Attendees:
- Gary O’Neall
- Bill Schineller
- Kirsten Newcomer
- Ed Warnicke
- Steve Cropper
- Rana Rahal
- Jack Manbeck
- Peter Williams
Agenda:
- · Discussion on SPDX package definitions
- · Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)
Package definitions:
- Start with Wiki’s definitions
- Kate proposed any collection of files
- Jack’s proposal – unit of delivery of software files
- What is a “unit” of delivery, over time one unit of delivery may not be a unit of delivery later in the supply chain
- Discussion on package/subpackage supply chain model [manufacturing analogy]
- Different between unit of consumption vs. unit of delivery
- The current RDF Package definition could be used
- Discussion on if a single file could be both a package and not a package
- Agreed on the usefulness of a definition “{} represent a collection of one or more files that are delivered as a unit" vs "A package represents a collection of software files that are delivered as a single functional component" from <a href="http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package">http://spdx.org/system/files/spdx-rdf-terms_27.html#Package</a>
- The “{}” term will be replaced with an agreed upon term (TBD)
- Follow-up on possibly further defining “delivered as a unit”