THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Old/Sandbox for Sharing Examples/OpenLogic SPDX 1.0 beta examples"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<p>Here are some examples generated by OpenLogic.&nbsp; The are comformant to the 1.0 beta version of the spec.&nbsp; </p>
+
Here are some examples generated by OpenLogic. The are comformant to the 1.0 beta version of the spec.
  
<h3>Notes</h3>
+
'''Notes'''
  
<p>The resulting files are well-formed RDF.&nbsp; However the graph they produce when parsed as RDF is total gibberish. It appears to be impossible to create a document that both matches the current spec and produces a meaningful RDF graph.</p>
+
The resulting files are well-formed RDF. However the graph they produce when parsed as RDF is total gibberish. It appears to be impossible to create a document that both matches the current spec and produces a meaningful RDF graph.
  
<p>The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2">SHA-256</a> to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.</p>
+
The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2 SHA-256] to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Technical]]
 +
[[Category:Archived]]

Latest revision as of 15:40, 6 March 2013

Here are some examples generated by OpenLogic. The are comformant to the 1.0 beta version of the spec.

Notes

The resulting files are well-formed RDF. However the graph they produce when parsed as RDF is total gibberish. It appears to be impossible to create a document that both matches the current spec and produces a meaningful RDF graph.

The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses SHA-256 to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.