THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx
Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Old/Sandbox for Sharing Examples/OpenLogic SPDX 1.0 beta examples"
From SPDX Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<h3>Notes</h3> | <h3>Notes</h3> | ||
| − | <p>The resulting files are well-formed RDF | + | <p>The resulting files are well-formed RDF. However the graph they produce when parsed as RDF is total gibberish. It appears to be impossible to create a document that both matches the current spec and produces a meaningful RDF graph.</p> |
<p>The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2">SHA-256</a> to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.</p> | <p>The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2">SHA-256</a> to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.</p> | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 29 September 2010
Here are some examples generated by OpenLogic. The are comformant to the 1.0 beta version of the spec.
Notes
The resulting files are well-formed RDF. However the graph they produce when parsed as RDF is total gibberish. It appears to be impossible to create a document that both matches the current spec and produces a meaningful RDF graph.
The OpenLogic License Analysis system uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2">SHA-256</a> to produce checksums of files. We replaced the SHA1 tag with SHA256 to indicate this.
