THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2012-07-17"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 7/17/2012</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Attendees:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Gary O’Neall</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Bill Schineller</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Peter William</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Marshall Clow</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Brandon Robinson</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Ed Warnicke</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agenda:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Use cases</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Linux Con:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Marshal – no to Tuesday (available Thursday/Friday, but not Tuesday or Wednesday)</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Jack and Kate will be available</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Black Duck will have some representation, but not sure who at this point</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Peter will not be available</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Ed Warnicke will be available</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Brandon and Gary – don’t know yet</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">1.1 Release:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">2 new bug from Gary’s review of the spec and vocabulary.&nbsp; Likely just details that can be fixed in the spec.</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Use Cases:</span></p><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">SPDX Lite use case</span><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Would like to include Kate on the discussion before finalizing.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">&nbsp;Agreed to separate out the definition of the use case from the decision to implement a use case.</span></span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Inconsistency between having the checksum in the Scenerio and the goal statement indicating files change frequently.&nbsp; Drop checksum from the list.&nbsp; This is included in the validation use case.&nbsp; Added to the validation use case a pointer back to the SPDX-Lite use case to remember the possible conflict.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Discussion on package level or project level.&nbsp; Project level has existing formats (e.g. DOAP).&nbsp; Package level may be too limited in scope.&nbsp; Agreed scope should be “copyrightable things”</span></li></ul></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Agreed to use term “OK” in the use case to mean the use case is well defined, and not to mean that the use case is agreed to be implemented</span></li></ul>
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Gary O’Neall
 +
* Bill Schineller
 +
* Peter William
 +
* Kirsten Newcomer
 +
* Marshall Clow
 +
* Brandon Robinson
 +
* Ed Warnicke
 +
 
 +
== Agenda ==
 +
 
 +
* Use cases
 +
 
 +
== Linux Con ==
 +
 
 +
* Marshall – no to Tuesday (available Thursday/Friday, but not Tuesday or Wednesday)
 +
* Jack and Kate will be available
 +
* Black Duck will have some representation, but not sure who at this point
 +
* Peter will not be available
 +
* Ed Warnicke will be available
 +
* Brandon and Gary – don’t know yet
 +
 
 +
== 1.1 Release ==
 +
 
 +
* 2 new bug from Gary’s review of the spec and vocabulary. Likely just details that can be fixed in the spec.
 +
 
 +
== Use Cases ==
 +
 
 +
* SPDX Lite use case
 +
** Would like to include Kate on the discussion before finalizing.
 +
** Agreed to separate out the definition of the use case from the decision to implement a use case.
 +
** Inconsistency between having the checksum in the Scenerio and the goal statement indicating files change frequently. Drop checksum from the list. This is included in the validation use case. Added to the validation use case a pointer back to the SPDX-Lite use case to remember the possible conflict.
 +
** Discussion on package level or project level. Project level has existing formats (e.g. DOAP). Package level may be too limited in scope. Agreed scope should be “copyrightable things”
 +
* Agreed to use term “OK” in the use case to mean the use case is well defined, and not to mean that the use case is agreed to be implemented
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 13:34, 6 March 2013

Attendees

  • Gary O’Neall
  • Bill Schineller
  • Peter William
  • Kirsten Newcomer
  • Marshall Clow
  • Brandon Robinson
  • Ed Warnicke

Agenda

  • Use cases

Linux Con

  • Marshall – no to Tuesday (available Thursday/Friday, but not Tuesday or Wednesday)
  • Jack and Kate will be available
  • Black Duck will have some representation, but not sure who at this point
  • Peter will not be available
  • Ed Warnicke will be available
  • Brandon and Gary – don’t know yet

1.1 Release

  • 2 new bug from Gary’s review of the spec and vocabulary. Likely just details that can be fixed in the spec.

Use Cases

  • SPDX Lite use case
    • Would like to include Kate on the discussion before finalizing.
    • Agreed to separate out the definition of the use case from the decision to implement a use case.
    • Inconsistency between having the checksum in the Scenerio and the goal statement indicating files change frequently. Drop checksum from the list. This is included in the validation use case. Added to the validation use case a pointer back to the SPDX-Lite use case to remember the possible conflict.
    • Discussion on package level or project level. Project level has existing formats (e.g. DOAP). Package level may be too limited in scope. Agreed scope should be “copyrightable things”
  • Agreed to use term “OK” in the use case to mean the use case is well defined, and not to mean that the use case is agreed to be implemented