THE SPDX WIKI IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. ALL CONTENT HAS BEEN MOVED TO https://github.com/spdx

Difference between revisions of "Technical Team/Minutes/2010-12-21"

From SPDX Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Convert to MediaWiki syntax)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<p>SPDX Technical Call<br />12/21/2010</p><p>Attendees:<br />Bill Schineller<br />Gary O'Neall<br />Peter Williams<br />Kate Stewart</p><p>Review of previous meetings</p><p>RDF to Tag notation - Kate to provide a grammer.&nbsp; Will include the zlib example in the tag/value format</p><p>Key discussion point is how the implicit section boundaries will impact forward compatibility (issue 589)</p><p>Review of issues recorded in the issue tracking</p><p>Issue 590 - How individual files are referenced:<br />&nbsp;- Discussed use cases for having a unique reference to a file<br />&nbsp;- Discussed whether we should have a single URL for a file<br />&nbsp;- Agreed that in the RDF, there needs to be a single URI (whether created by conventions or auto </p><p>generated in rdf/xml)<br />&nbsp;- Discussed an approach we feel will have merit where the tag/value format has 2 tags for a file </p><p>(package + file) and we have some documented conventions for converting between these 2 tags and the RDF </p><p>file URI</p><p>&nbsp;- We can use the example created for the tag notation to solidify the proposal</p><p>Discussion on the repository <br />&nbsp;- git repositories have been setup - the ontology <br />&nbsp;- Master will be the official version of the spec<br />&nbsp;- Proposal to have a post-commit rake task create the ontology</p><p>Need the appendices added to the git repository</p><p>Peter will send out an email on how to pull down the spdx-spec from the git repo</p><p>All - review the spdx-spec and document any questions/issues</p>
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Bill Schineller
 +
* Gary O'Neall
 +
* Peter Williams
 +
* Kate Stewart
 +
 
 +
== Review of previous meetings ==
 +
 
 +
RDF to Tag notation - Kate to provide a grammer. Will include the zlib example in the tag/value format
 +
 
 +
Key discussion point is how the implicit section boundaries will impact forward compatibility (issue 589)
 +
 
 +
== Review of issues recorded in the issue tracking ==
 +
 
 +
Issue 590 - How individual files are referenced:
 +
* Discussed use cases for having a unique reference to a file
 +
* Discussed whether we should have a single URL for a file
 +
* Areed that in the RDF, there needs to be a single URI (whether created by conventions or auto
 +
 
 +
generated in rdf/xml)
 +
* Discussed an approach we feel will have merit where the tag/value format has 2 tags for a file
 +
 
 +
(package + file) and we have some documented conventions for converting between these 2 tags and the RDF
 +
 
 +
file URI
 +
 
 +
* We can use the example created for the tag notation to solidify the proposal
 +
 
 +
Discussion on the repository
 +
* git repositories have been setup - the ontology
 +
* Master will be the official version of the spec
 +
* Proposal to have a post-commit rake task create the ontology
 +
 
 +
Need the appendices added to the git repository
 +
 
 +
Peter will send out an email on how to pull down the spdx-spec from the git repo
 +
 
 +
All - review the spdx-spec and document any questions/issues
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Technical|Minutes]]
 +
[[Category:Minutes]]

Latest revision as of 12:56, 6 March 2013

Attendees

  • Bill Schineller
  • Gary O'Neall
  • Peter Williams
  • Kate Stewart

Review of previous meetings

RDF to Tag notation - Kate to provide a grammer. Will include the zlib example in the tag/value format

Key discussion point is how the implicit section boundaries will impact forward compatibility (issue 589)

Review of issues recorded in the issue tracking

Issue 590 - How individual files are referenced:

  • Discussed use cases for having a unique reference to a file
  • Discussed whether we should have a single URL for a file
  • Areed that in the RDF, there needs to be a single URI (whether created by conventions or auto

generated in rdf/xml)

  • Discussed an approach we feel will have merit where the tag/value format has 2 tags for a file

(package + file) and we have some documented conventions for converting between these 2 tags and the RDF

file URI

  • We can use the example created for the tag notation to solidify the proposal

Discussion on the repository

  • git repositories have been setup - the ontology
  • Master will be the official version of the spec
  • Proposal to have a post-commit rake task create the ontology

Need the appendices added to the git repository

Peter will send out an email on how to pull down the spdx-spec from the git repo

All - review the spdx-spec and document any questions/issues