https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Technical_Team%2FMinutes%2F2015-11-10 2026-05-07T12:26:00Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.23.13 https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=Technical_Team/Minutes/2015-11-10&diff=3729&oldid=prev 2015-11-10T19:29:07Z

<p>Created page with &quot;November 10, 2015 == Attendees == * Gary O&#039;Neall * Yev Bronshteyn * Bill Schineller * Kate Stewart * Scott Sterling * Matt Germonprez * Michael Herzog ==Snippets== * Proposal...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>November 10, 2015<br /> == Attendees ==<br /> * Gary O'Neall<br /> * Yev Bronshteyn<br /> * Bill Schineller<br /> * Kate Stewart<br /> * Scott Sterling<br /> * Matt Germonprez<br /> * Michael Herzog<br /> ==Snippets==<br /> * Proposal located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/13OknzNnY56UZhnj_VVPatirBrNze5cWXDx2fnKbBI_g/edit#heading=h.nmf14n<br /> * Reviewed latest proposal<br /> * Snippet Names<br /> ** Argument for name<br /> *** Consistency with other SPDXItems and SPDXElements<br /> *** Makes it easier for tools developers to common code if the model was consistent<br /> *** It is possible that some of the snippets will be popular enough that a name makes sense<br /> ** Arguments against name<br /> *** No strong use case where comments could be applied to solve the use cases<br /> ** It is important that it is optional<br /> ** Agreed on the call leaving name in<br /> ** Agreed it should be optional<br /> ** Updated text for the intent to include consistency as one of the reasons<br /> * Review Snippet Comments<br /> ** Agreed that it is fine - consistent with other use of comments<br /> * Discussed Olivier's comments on Snippets<br /> ** We should make sure it is clear that Snippets are optional<br /> ** The first statement in Snippets makes it sound like it is required<br /> ** Suggest updating the first statement: &quot;Optional&quot;, &quot;when a snippet can be cleanly identified&quot;<br /> ** Updated first couple sentences in proposal<br /> ** Follow-up with legal team to make sure the snippet use case is a valid use case<br /> ** Use the JavaScript mash-up example - does not require interpretation<br /> ** Kate has the action from General meeting to follow-up with Oliver<br /> ** Gary will follow-up with Kate<br /> * No other snippet items were reviewed - Propose this as a candidate<br /> [[Category:Technical|Minutes]]<br /> [[Category:Minutes]]</div>

Goneall