https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Technical_Team%2FMinutes%2F2014-04-15 2026-05-07T15:27:09Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.23.13 https://wiki.spdx.org/index.php?title=Technical_Team/Minutes/2014-04-15&diff=3197&oldid=prev 2014-04-15T19:02:31Z

<p>Created page with &quot;April 15, 2014 == Attendees == * Gary O’Neall * Bill Schineller * Michael Herzog * Michael Söderberg * Scott Sterling * Jack Manbeck * Sameer Ahmed * Kate Stewart == Agenda...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>April 15, 2014<br /> == Attendees ==<br /> * Gary O’Neall<br /> * Bill Schineller<br /> * Michael Herzog<br /> * Michael Söderberg<br /> * Scott Sterling<br /> * Jack Manbeck<br /> * Sameer Ahmed<br /> * Kate Stewart<br /> == Agenda ==<br /> * Review schedule on http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Business_Team/SPDX_2_0_Project<br /> * Relationship and Usage<br /> ==Schedule Review==<br /> * Who can make LinuxCon in Chicago and in Europe (Oct. 13)<br /> ** Kate and Jack can make both<br /> ** Gary is likely for Chicago, possible Europe<br /> ** Sameer not able to make either<br /> ** Bill - someone from Black Duck should be able to attend<br /> * Review of SPDX_2_0_Project wiki page<br /> ** Added link to the current spec draft in the useful links<br /> ** Updated descriptions<br /> ** Gary to upload slides for object model and Jack<br /> == Relationship and Usage==<br /> * Relationship type is required<br /> * Usage type is optional<br /> * Do we still need a file type<br /> ** A usage is intrinsic to the relationship<br /> ** A file type is intrinsic to the file - independent of how it is used - e.g. a binary may be optional, dynamic library, data file depending on how it is used<br /> * Review usage types from Gary's email<br /> ** Reference_Impl - instead of usage type Reference_Impl - use a more general example?<br /> *** Could remove<br /> *** Reference_Impl term has different symantics for different verticals<br /> *** Agree to remove - can come back to this in 2.1<br /> * Review Bill's email on relationship types<br /> ** artifactOf - should be an extended version existing property and not a new relationshipType<br /> ** PatchOf - need both directions - patches or patchApplied and patchOn or Of<br /> *Review of consolidated spreadsheet<br /> ** Gary to send out 1 line descriptions for each relationship/usage type in the use case analysis column<br /> ** Next week, we can use the spreadsheet to come up with a consolidated list of usage and relationship types<br /> <br /> [[Category:Technical|Minutes]]<br /> [[Category:Minutes]]</div>

Goneall