Technical Team/Minutes/2013-03-12 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-22T08:25:29Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Goneall at 19:52, 12 March 2013

2013-03-12T19:52:43Z

New page

Minutes 3/12/2013Attendees:<ul><li>·         Gary O’Neall</li><li>·         Marshall Clow</li><li>·         Bill Schineller</li><li>·         Kirsten Newcomer</li><li>·         Kate Stewart</li><li>·         Michael Herzog</li></ul> Agenda:<ul><li>·         Model Discussion</li><li>·         Updates</li></ul>Modeling:<ul><li>·         Gary will update the model based on last week’s discussion and post a new graphic and the input data for the model</li><li>·         Bill to send out Snippets modeling discussion out to the group for a broader discussion</li><li>·         Annotation Discussion <ul><li>o   Annotations in Ed’s proposal are used for properties (both standard and additional properties) and for a “changelog”</li><li>o   Merged model is using it more as a changelog</li><li>o   Should the Annotations be tied to the relationship?</li><li>o   It could also be tied to the SPDXDocument or the SPDX Element</li><li>o   Are comments sufficient?<ul><li>§  Annotations are more machine readable</li><li>o   Proposal to handle changelogs with comments in the Relationship object</li><li>o   Proposal to handle changelogs with Reviewer comments</li><li>o   Agreed to move the discussion from Annotations concept in general to more specific use cases</li><li>o   One use case that needs exploring is the “changlogs” for new versions of SPDX documents</li><li>o   Tabling annotations and keeping SPDX elements alive</li><li>o   Should we have the SPDX relationship at the SPDX Doc level, SPDX Element level, or both?</li><li>o   Agree to remove annotation from the model for now</li><li>o   Agree to add a SPDX Doc to SPDX doc relationship</li><li>o   ArtifactOf – need to discuss how this relates to the relationship (follow-up discussion)</li><li>o   Add comment to relationship objects</li></ul></li></ul></li></ul>

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 22 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 3/12/2013</span></p><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Attendees~~:</span></p><ul><li><span style~~=~~"font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Gary O’Neall~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Marshall Clow~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Bill Schineller~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Kirsten Newcomer~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Kate Stewart~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Michael Herzog~~</span></li></ul><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;"> </span></p><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agenda~~:</span></p><ul><li><span style~~=~~"font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Model Discussion~~</span></li><li><span style~~=~~"font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Updates</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Modeling~~:</span></p><ul><li><span style~~=~~"font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Gary will update the model based on last week’s discussion and post a new graphic and the input data for the model~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Bill to send out Snippets modeling discussion out to the group for a broader discussion~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">·</span>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Annotation Discussion ~~</span><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Annotations in Ed’s proposal are used for properties (both standard and additional properties) and for a “changelog”~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Merged model is using it more as a changelog~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Should the Annotations be tied to the relationship?~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~It could also be tied to the SPDXDocument or the SPDX Element~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Are comments sufficient?~~</span><ul><li><span style="font-size: medium;">§</span>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Annotations are more machine readable~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Proposal to handle changelogs with comments in the Relationship object~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Proposal to handle changelogs with Reviewer comments~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agreed to move the discussion from Annotations concept in general to more specific use cases~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~One use case that needs exploring is the “changlogs” for new versions of SPDX documents~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Tabling annotations and keeping SPDX elements alive~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Should we have the SPDX relationship at the SPDX Doc level, SPDX Element level, or both?~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agree to remove annotation from the model for now~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agree to add a SPDX Doc to SPDX doc relationship~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~ArtifactOf – need to discuss how this relates to the relationship (follow-up discussion)~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Add comment to relationship objects~~</span></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p> </p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Gary O’Neall
		+	* Marshall Clow
		+	* Bill Schineller
		+	* Kirsten Newcomer
		+	* Kate Stewart
		+	* Michael Herzog
		+
		+	== Agenda ==
		+
		+	* Model Discussion
		+	* Updates
		+
		+	== Modeling ==
		+
		+	* Gary will update the model based on last week’s discussion and post a new graphic and the input data for the model
		+	* Bill to send out Snippets modeling discussion out to the group for a broader discussion
		+	* Annotation Discussion
		+	** Annotations in Ed’s proposal are used for properties (both standard and additional properties) and for a “changelog”
		+	** Merged model is using it more as a changelog
		+	** Should the Annotations be tied to the relationship?
		+	** It could also be tied to the SPDXDocument or the SPDX Element
		+	** Are comments sufficient?
		+	*** Annotations are more machine readable
		+	** Proposal to handle changelogs with comments in the Relationship object
		+	** Proposal to handle changelogs with Reviewer comments
		+	** Agreed to move the discussion from Annotations concept in general to more specific use cases
		+	** One use case that needs exploring is the “changlogs” for new versions of SPDX documents
		+	** Tabling annotations and keeping SPDX elements alive
		+	** Should we have the SPDX relationship at the SPDX Doc level, SPDX Element level, or both?
		+	** Agree to remove annotation from the model for now
		+	** Agree to add a SPDX Doc to SPDX doc relationship
		+	** ArtifactOf – need to discuss how this relates to the relationship (follow-up discussion)
		+	** Add comment to relationship objects
		+
		+	[[Category:Technical\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]