Technical Team/Minutes/2012-04-04 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T13:28:48Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Knewcomer at 23:41, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T23:41:16Z

Knewcomer at 01:21, 5 April 2012

2012-04-05T01:21:23Z

New page

Minutes for April 4, 2012 Face to Face meeting at Linux Collaboration SummitAttendees:Marshall ClowKate StewartEd WarnickeJack ManbeckGary O’NeallPeter WilliamsBill SchinellerKirsten Newcomer Discussed proposed agenda for Thursday afternoon (4/5) meeting<ul><li>Use case discussion (Thursday)</li><li>Mandatory vs. non-mandatory / backwards compatibility</li><li>SPDX Tech web site<ul><li>Review progress; request update from volunteers, and from Steve C.</li></ul></li></ul> Steps needed to close on v 1.1 of the spec<ul><li>Get Tech team to sign off, then publish to general team for final review</li><li>Open issues:<ul><li>final pass to ensure RDF and spec are in synch -- Kate</li><li>Appendix 1 will be updated to reflect what’s on the website as of date -- Kate</li><li>Review section 1 to see if it needs to be updated  -- Kirsten</li><li>Compare version 1.1 and 1.0 side by side -- Kirsten</li><li>5.3 & 5.4:<ul><li>Per discussion, these fields will be made OPTIONAL -- Kate</li><li>Peter to provide a proposal for how to present RDF examples for these fields</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Provide guidelines to consumers for adopting 1.1<ul><li>Minimum: update Data License and Package verification code</li><li>Available OSS tools support multiple versions of the spec</li></ul></li></ul> Proposed governance model for SDPX Technical group<ul><li>Post agenda one day ahead of call</li><ul><li>Kate owns and will delegate as needed</li></ul><li>Proposals to be voted on will be posted to wiki and sent to mailing list</li><ul><li>Votes sent to mailing list</li><li>Votes tabulated on wiki (with names)</li></ul><ul><li>We will use Plus one model for votes<ul><li>Plus one (+) is a yes vote</li><li>Minus (-) is a no vote</li><li>Zero (0) is a present / don’t care vote</li></ul></li></ul><li>Any objection / negative vote results in a call scheduled on the topic<ul><li>We assume that if you voted minus, you’ll participate in call</li></ul></li></ul>Brief discussion of signing & review fields<ul><li>Suggest using annotations on already signed files for review data</li></ul>Discussed schedule for 2.0. Potential schedule:<ul><li>Draft by end of 2012, with beta program<ul><li>Need tools lined up to support beta</li><li>Provide v2.0 SPDX document as an example</li><li>2.0 GA is about 1 year out</li></ul></li></ul>Proposed To-Do list for next 12 months<ul><li>Mailing list for users: spdx-users</li><li>Publicize IRC channel; ensure registered</li><li>Additional tools needed</li><ul><li>SPDX document for existing tools -- Gary</li><li>SPDX validator – enhance viewer</li><li>Reading packages and generating SPDX files – Ninka, Fossology<ul><li>Gary has offered to help Fossology</li></ul></li><li>License matching normalization – Kate</li><li>License matcher – input text, and check to see if one of the standard licenses, leverage normalization tool</li></ul><ul><li>Existing tools now handle tag value format<ul><li>Go between tag and rdf and spreadsheet</li></ul></li></ul><li>Tooling available with<ul><li>Ubuntu – Kate & Gary</li><li>RPM</li></ul></li><li>SPDX tools available via SaaS model<ul><li>Amazon offers an option here</li><li>Gary has an instance already; UI needed</li><li>Ask LF to pay for hosting this instance for fixed domain (Kate/Jack will approach Jim when we’re ready)</li></ul></li><li>Additional documentation is needed</li><ul><li>Getting Started Guide with SPDX</li><li>YouTube video</li><li>Update tools documentation – Kirsten</li><li>Translated version of v1.1 into Japanese – Kirsten to see if I can find a volunteer to do this by June</li><ul><li>Future: identify process for getting spec and related materials translated by community volunteers</li></ul></ul></ul>SPDX 2.0 Use Case review & discussion: changes based on discussion captured in wiki changes<ul><li>NOTE: Review to continue starting with item 12.</li></ul> As always, comments and corrections are most welcome!Kirsten

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p class="MsoNormal">~~Minutes for April 4, 2012 Face to Face meeting at Linux Collaboration Summit~~</p><p>~~Attendees~~:</p><p>~~Marshall Clow~~</p><p>~~Kate Stewart~~</p><p>~~Ed Warnicke~~</p><p>~~Jack Manbeck~~</p><p>~~Gary O’Neall~~</p><p>~~Peter Williams~~</p><p>~~Bill Schineller~~</p><p>~~Kirsten Newcomer~~</p><p> </p><p><strong>~~Discussed proposed agenda for Thursday afternoon (4/5) meeting~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Use case discussion (Thursday)~~</li><li>~~Mandatory vs. non-mandatory / backwards compatibility~~</li><li>~~SPDX Tech web site~~<ul><li>~~Review progress; request update from volunteers, and from Steve C.~~</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>~~Steps needed to close on v 1.1 of the spec~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Get Tech team to sign off, then publish to general team for final review~~</li><li>~~Open issues:~~<ul><li>~~final pass to ensure RDF and spec are in synch -- Kate~~</li><li>~~Appendix 1 will be updated to reflect what’s on the website as of date -- Kate~~</li><li>~~Review section 1 to see if it needs to be updated~~ ~~ -- Kirsten~~</li><li>~~Compare version 1.1 and 1.0 side by side -- Kirsten~~</li><li>~~Compare RDF terms, Spec terms, and tool implementation for 1.1 - Gary~~</li><li>~~5.3 & 5.4:~~<ul><li>~~Per discussion, these fields will be made OPTIONAL -- Kate~~</li><li>~~Peter to provide a proposal for how to present RDF examples for these fields~~</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>~~Provide guidelines to consumers for adopting 1.1~~<ul><li>~~Minimum: update Data License and Package verification code~~</li><li>~~Available OSS tools support multiple versions of the spec~~</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>~~Proposed governance model for SDPX Technical group~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Post agenda one day ahead of call~~</li><ul><li>~~Kate owns and will delegate as needed~~</li></ul><li>~~Proposals to be voted on will be posted to wiki and sent to mailing list~~</li><ul><li>~~Votes sent to mailing list~~</li><li>~~Votes tabulated on wiki (with names)~~</li></ul><ul><li>~~We will use Plus one model for votes~~<ul><li>~~Plus one (+) is a yes vote~~</li><li>~~Minus (-) is a no vote~~</li><li>~~Zero (0) is a present / don’t care vote~~</li></ul></li></ul><li>~~Any objection / negative vote results in a call scheduled on the topic~~<ul><li>~~We assume that if you voted minus, you’ll participate in call~~</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>~~Brief discussion of signing & review fields~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Suggest using annotations on already signed files for review data~~</li></ul><p><strong>~~Discussed schedule for 2.0. Potential schedule~~:</strong></p><ul><li>~~Draft by end of 2012, with beta program~~<ul><li>~~Need tools lined up to support beta~~</li><li>~~Provide v2.0 SPDX document as an example~~</li><li>~~2.0 GA is about 1 year out~~</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>~~Proposed To-Do list for next 12 months~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Mailing list for users: spdx-users~~</li><li>~~Publicize IRC channel; ensure registered~~</li><li>~~Additional tools needed~~</li><ul><li>~~SPDX document for existing tools -- Gary~~</li><li>~~SPDX validator – enhance viewer~~</li><li>~~Reading packages and generating SPDX files – Ninka, Fossology~~<ul><li>~~Gary has offered to help Fossology~~</li></ul></li><li>~~License matching normalization – Kate & Daniel G.~~</li><li>~~License matcher – input text, and check to see if one of the standard licenses, leverage normalization tool~~</li></ul><ul><li>~~Existing tools now handle tag value format~~<ul><li>~~Go between tag and rdf and spreadsheet~~</li></ul></li></ul><li>~~Tooling available with~~<ul><li>~~Ubuntu – Kate & Gary~~</li><li>~~RPM~~</li></ul></li><li>~~SPDX tools available via SaaS model~~<ul><li>~~Amazon offers an option here~~</li><li>~~Gary has an instance already; UI needed~~</li><li>~~Ask LF to pay for hosting this instance for fixed domain (Kate/Jack will approach Jim when we’re ready)~~</li></ul></li><li>~~Additional documentation is needed~~</li><ul><li>~~Getting Started Guide with SPDX~~</li><li>~~YouTube video~~</li><li>~~Update tools documentation – Kirsten~~</li><li>~~Translated version of v1.1 into Japanese – Kirsten to see if I can find a volunteer to do this by June~~</li><ul><li>~~Future: identify process for getting spec and related materials translated by community volunteers~~</li></ul></ul></ul><p>~~SPDX 2.0 Use Case review & discussion: changes based on discussion captured in wiki changes~~</p><ul><li>~~NOTE: Review to continue starting with item 12.~~</li></ul><p> </p><p>~~As always, comments and corrections are most welcome!~~</p><p>~~Kirsten~~</p>~~	+	Minutes for April 4, 2012 Face to Face meeting at Linux Collaboration Summit
		+
		+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Marshall Clow
		+	* Kate Stewart
		+	* Ed Warnicke
		+	* Jack Manbeck
		+	* Gary O’Neall
		+	* Peter Williams
		+	* Bill Schineller
		+	* Kirsten Newcomer
		+
		+	== Discussed proposed agenda for Thursday afternoon (4/5) meeting ==
		+
		+	* Use case discussion (Thursday)
		+	* Mandatory vs. non-mandatory / backwards compatibility
		+	* SPDX Tech web site
		+	** Review progress; request update from volunteers, and from Steve C.
		+
		+	== Steps needed to close on v 1.1 of the spec ==
		+
		+	* Get Tech team to sign off, then publish to general team for final review
		+	* Open issues:
		+	** final pass to ensure RDF and spec are in synch -- Kate
		+	** Appendix 1 will be updated to reflect what’s on the website as of date -- Kate
		+	** Review section 1 to see if it needs to be updated -- Kirsten
		+	** Compare version 1.1 and 1.0 side by side -- Kirsten
		+	** Compare RDF terms, Spec terms, and tool implementation for 1.1 - Gary
		+	** 5.3 & 5.4:
		+	*** Per discussion, these fields will be made OPTIONAL -- Kate
		+	*** Peter to provide a proposal for how to present RDF examples for these fields
		+	* Provide guidelines to consumers for adopting 1.1
		+	** Minimum: update Data License and Package verification code
		+	** Available OSS tools support multiple versions of the spec
		+
		+	== Proposed governance model for SDPX Technical group ==
		+
		+	* Post agenda one day ahead of call
		+	** Kate owns and will delegate as needed
		+	* Proposals to be voted on will be posted to wiki and sent to mailing list
		+	** Votes sent to mailing list
		+	** Votes tabulated on wiki (with names)
		+	** We will use Plus one model for votes
		+	*** Plus one (+) is a yes vote
		+	*** Minus (-) is a no vote
		+	*** Zero (0) is a present / don’t care vote
		+	* Any objection / negative vote results in a call scheduled on the topic
		+	** We assume that if you voted minus, you’ll participate in call
		+
		+	== Brief discussion of signing & review fields ==
		+
		+	* Suggest using annotations on already signed files for review data
		+
		+	== Discussed schedule for 2.0. Potential schedule ==
		+
		+	* Draft by end of 2012, with beta program
		+	** Need tools lined up to support beta
		+	** Provide v2.0 SPDX document as an example
		+	** 2.0 GA is about 1 year out
		+
		+	== Proposed To-Do list for next 12 months ==
		+
		+	* Mailing list for users: spdx-users
		+	* Publicize IRC channel; ensure registered
		+	* Additional tools needed
		+	** SPDX document for existing tools -- Gary
		+	** SPDX validator – enhance viewer
		+	** Reading packages and generating SPDX files – Ninka, Fossology
		+	*** Gary has offered to help Fossology
		+	** License matching normalization – Kate & Daniel G.
		+	** License matcher – input text, and check to see if one of the standard licenses, leverage normalization tool
		+	** Existing tools now handle tag value format
		+	*** Go between tag and rdf and spreadsheet
		+	* Tooling available with
		+	** Ubuntu – Kate & Gary
		+	** RPM
		+	* SPDX tools available via SaaS model
		+	** Amazon offers an option here
		+	** Gary has an instance already; UI needed
		+	** Ask LF to pay for hosting this instance for fixed domain (Kate/Jack will approach Jim when we’re ready)
		+	* Additional documentation is needed
		+	** Getting Started Guide with SPDX
		+	** YouTube video
		+	** Update tools documentation – Kirsten
		+	** Translated version of v1.1 into Japanese – Kirsten to see if I can find a volunteer to do this by June
		+	*** Future: identify process for getting spec and related materials translated by community volunteers
		+
		+	SPDX 2.0 Use Case review & discussion: changes based on discussion captured in wiki changes
		+
		+	* NOTE: Review to continue starting with item 12.
		+
		+	As always, comments and corrections are most welcome!
		+
		+	Kirsten
		+
		+	[[Category:Technical\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 5 April 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p class="MsoNormal">Minutes for April 4, 2012 Face to Face meeting at Linux Collaboration Summit</p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Marshall Clow</p><p>Kate Stewart</p><p>Ed Warnicke</p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Gary O’Neall</p><p>Peter Williams</p><p>Bill Schineller</p><p>Kirsten Newcomer</p><p> </p><p><strong>Discussed proposed agenda for Thursday afternoon (4/5) meeting</strong></p><ul><li>Use case discussion (Thursday)</li><li>Mandatory vs. non-mandatory / backwards compatibility</li><li>SPDX Tech web site<ul><li>Review progress; request update from volunteers, and from Steve C.</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>Steps needed to close on v 1.1 of the spec</strong></p><ul><li>Get Tech team to sign off, then publish to general team for final review</li><li>Open issues:<ul><li>final pass to ensure RDF and spec are in synch -- Kate</li><li>Appendix 1 will be updated to reflect what’s on the website as of date -- Kate</li><li>Review section 1 to see if it needs to be updated  -- Kirsten</li><li>Compare version 1.1 and 1.0 side by side -- Kirsten</li><li>5.3 & 5.4:<ul><li>Per discussion, these fields will be made OPTIONAL -- Kate</li><li>Peter to provide a proposal for how to present RDF examples for these fields</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Provide guidelines to consumers for adopting 1.1<ul><li>Minimum: update Data License and Package verification code</li><li>Available OSS tools support multiple versions of the spec</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>Proposed governance model for SDPX Technical group</strong></p><ul><li>Post agenda one day ahead of call</li><ul><li>Kate owns and will delegate as needed</li></ul><li>Proposals to be voted on will be posted to wiki and sent to mailing list</li><ul><li>Votes sent to mailing list</li><li>Votes tabulated on wiki (with names)</li></ul><ul><li>We will use Plus one model for votes<ul><li>Plus one (+) is a yes vote</li><li>Minus (-) is a no vote</li><li>Zero (0) is a present / don’t care vote</li></ul></li></ul><li>Any objection / negative vote results in a call scheduled on the topic<ul><li>We assume that if you voted minus, you’ll participate in call</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Brief discussion of signing & review fields</strong></p><ul><li>Suggest using annotations on already signed files for review data</li></ul><p><strong>Discussed schedule for 2.0. Potential schedule:</strong></p><ul><li>Draft by end of 2012, with beta program<ul><li>Need tools lined up to support beta</li><li>Provide v2.0 SPDX document as an example</li><li>2.0 GA is about 1 year out</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Proposed To-Do list for next 12 months</strong></p><ul><li>Mailing list for users: spdx-users</li><li>Publicize IRC channel; ensure registered</li><li>Additional tools needed</li><ul><li>SPDX document for existing tools -- Gary</li><li>SPDX validator – enhance viewer</li><li>Reading packages and generating SPDX files – Ninka, Fossology<ul><li>Gary has offered to help Fossology</li></ul></li><li>License matching normalization – Kate</li><li>License matcher – input text, and check to see if one of the standard licenses, leverage normalization tool</li></ul><ul><li>Existing tools now handle tag value format<ul><li>Go between tag and rdf and spreadsheet</li></ul></li></ul><li>Tooling available with<ul><li>Ubuntu – Kate & Gary</li><li>RPM</li></ul></li><li>SPDX tools available via SaaS model<ul><li>Amazon offers an option here</li><li>Gary has an instance already; UI needed</li><li>Ask LF to pay for hosting this instance for fixed domain (Kate/Jack will approach Jim when we’re ready)</li></ul></li><li>Additional documentation is needed</li><ul><li>Getting Started Guide with SPDX</li><li>YouTube video</li><li>Update tools documentation – Kirsten</li><li>Translated version of v1.1 into Japanese – Kirsten to see if I can find a volunteer to do this by June</li><ul><li>Future: identify process for getting spec and related materials translated by community volunteers</li></ul></ul></ul><p>SPDX 2.0 Use Case review & discussion: changes based on discussion captured in wiki changes</p><ul><li>NOTE: Review to continue starting with item 12.</li></ul><p> </p><p>As always, comments and corrections are most welcome!</p><p>Kirsten</p>	+	<p class="MsoNormal">Minutes for April 4, 2012 Face to Face meeting at Linux Collaboration Summit</p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Marshall Clow</p><p>Kate Stewart</p><p>Ed Warnicke</p><p>Jack Manbeck</p><p>Gary O’Neall</p><p>Peter Williams</p><p>Bill Schineller</p><p>Kirsten Newcomer</p><p> </p><p><strong>Discussed proposed agenda for Thursday afternoon (4/5) meeting</strong></p><ul><li>Use case discussion (Thursday)</li><li>Mandatory vs. non-mandatory / backwards compatibility</li><li>SPDX Tech web site<ul><li>Review progress; request update from volunteers, and from Steve C.</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>Steps needed to close on v 1.1 of the spec</strong></p><ul><li>Get Tech team to sign off, then publish to general team for final review</li><li>Open issues:<ul><li>final pass to ensure RDF and spec are in synch -- Kate</li><li>Appendix 1 will be updated to reflect what’s on the website as of date -- Kate</li><li>Review section 1 to see if it needs to be updated  -- Kirsten</li><li>Compare version 1.1 and 1.0 side by side -- Kirsten</li><li>Compare RDF terms, Spec terms, and tool implementation for 1.1 - Gary</li><li>5.3 & 5.4:<ul><li>Per discussion, these fields will be made OPTIONAL -- Kate</li><li>Peter to provide a proposal for how to present RDF examples for these fields</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>Provide guidelines to consumers for adopting 1.1<ul><li>Minimum: update Data License and Package verification code</li><li>Available OSS tools support multiple versions of the spec</li></ul></li></ul><p> <strong>Proposed governance model for SDPX Technical group</strong></p><ul><li>Post agenda one day ahead of call</li><ul><li>Kate owns and will delegate as needed</li></ul><li>Proposals to be voted on will be posted to wiki and sent to mailing list</li><ul><li>Votes sent to mailing list</li><li>Votes tabulated on wiki (with names)</li></ul><ul><li>We will use Plus one model for votes<ul><li>Plus one (+) is a yes vote</li><li>Minus (-) is a no vote</li><li>Zero (0) is a present / don’t care vote</li></ul></li></ul><li>Any objection / negative vote results in a call scheduled on the topic<ul><li>We assume that if you voted minus, you’ll participate in call</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Brief discussion of signing & review fields</strong></p><ul><li>Suggest using annotations on already signed files for review data</li></ul><p><strong>Discussed schedule for 2.0. Potential schedule:</strong></p><ul><li>Draft by end of 2012, with beta program<ul><li>Need tools lined up to support beta</li><li>Provide v2.0 SPDX document as an example</li><li>2.0 GA is about 1 year out</li></ul></li></ul><p><strong>Proposed To-Do list for next 12 months</strong></p><ul><li>Mailing list for users: spdx-users</li><li>Publicize IRC channel; ensure registered</li><li>Additional tools needed</li><ul><li>SPDX document for existing tools -- Gary</li><li>SPDX validator – enhance viewer</li><li>Reading packages and generating SPDX files – Ninka, Fossology<ul><li>Gary has offered to help Fossology</li></ul></li><li>License matching normalization – Kate & Daniel G.</li><li>License matcher – input text, and check to see if one of the standard licenses, leverage normalization tool</li></ul><ul><li>Existing tools now handle tag value format<ul><li>Go between tag and rdf and spreadsheet</li></ul></li></ul><li>Tooling available with<ul><li>Ubuntu – Kate & Gary</li><li>RPM</li></ul></li><li>SPDX tools available via SaaS model<ul><li>Amazon offers an option here</li><li>Gary has an instance already; UI needed</li><li>Ask LF to pay for hosting this instance for fixed domain (Kate/Jack will approach Jim when we’re ready)</li></ul></li><li>Additional documentation is needed</li><ul><li>Getting Started Guide with SPDX</li><li>YouTube video</li><li>Update tools documentation – Kirsten</li><li>Translated version of v1.1 into Japanese – Kirsten to see if I can find a volunteer to do this by June</li><ul><li>Future: identify process for getting spec and related materials translated by community volunteers</li></ul></ul></ul><p>SPDX 2.0 Use Case review & discussion: changes based on discussion captured in wiki changes</p><ul><li>NOTE: Review to continue starting with item 12.</li></ul><p> </p><p>As always, comments and corrections are most welcome!</p><p>Kirsten</p>