Technical Team/Minutes/2012-02-14 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T14:13:04Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Goneall at 20:10, 14 February 2012

2012-02-14T20:10:12Z

New page

Minutes 2/14/2012Attendees:<ul><li>         Gary O’Neall</li><li>         Bill Schineller</li><li>         Kirsten Newcomer</li><li>         Jack Manbeck</li><li>         Savino Sguera</li><li>         Peter Williams</li><li>         Marshal Clow</li><li>         Ed Warnicke</li><li>         Rana Rahal</li><li>         Brandon Robinson</li></ul>Agenda:<ul><li>         Large license text update</li><li>         1.1 date</li><li>         Discussion on SPDX package definitions</li><li>         Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)</li></ul>Update on license text:<ul><li>         Bug 1003 – could just keep the HTML formatting and update the pretty printer to interpret the tags</li><li>         Will implement the license text as external text files encoded in UTF-8.  Spreadsheet will contain a link to the file.</li></ul>Collab. Summit:<ul><li>         Agree we should have a tech team meeting at the Linux Collab. Summit in April</li></ul>SPDX package definitionsHierarchical supply chain<ul><li>         Ed has been updating the Wiki page with additional details on 1.0 and 1.1 comparisons to proposed model.</li><li>         Discussion and review or Ed’s proposal<ul><li>   Enhanced model for Annotations</li><li>   Mapping table of the SPDX 1.0 sections to the proposed model<ul><li>  Package file name – should this be mandatory?  In the case of the archive file containing the SPDX file itself, does it makes sense to include the filename in the SPDX?</li><li>  Package originator – may not required with the supply chain model.  Discussion about different scenarios (such as there is no original SPDX file).  May depend on people generating SPDX files for the code they bring in.</li><li>  Discussion on annotation types – adding specific types to annotations will allow for compatibility with earlier versions</li><li>o   Discussion on alternative using subclasses for packages<ul><li>  Are the properties specific to a package or something more general?</li><li>  Conflict with specificer model<ul><li>         Are we overloading the specifier with specifying the properties?</li><li>         Does RDF already provide the mechanisms for concrete and references to the concrete data?</li><li>  Agree we should call SPDX Element SPDX Licensable</li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul>Gary will do some homework on mapping the properties into a model where SPDX Package is subclassed from SPDX Licensable.  Will also do some thinking about how to implement the specifier mechanism.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">Minutes 2/14/2012</span></p><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Attendees~~:</span></p><ul><li>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Gary O’Neall~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Bill Schineller~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Kirsten Newcomer~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Jack Manbeck~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Savino Sguera~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Peter Williams~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Marshal Clow~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Ed Warnicke~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">~~Rana Rahal~~<em></em></span></span></li><li>         <span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">~~Brandon Robinson~~<em></em></span></span></li></ul><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agenda~~:</span></p><ul><li>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Large license text update~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~1.1 date~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Discussion on SPDX package definitions~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)~~</span></li></ul><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Update on license text~~:</span></p><ul><li>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Bug 1003 – could just keep the HTML formatting and update the pretty printer to interpret the tags~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Will implement the license text as external text files encoded in UTF-8.~~ ~~ Spreadsheet will contain a link to the file.~~</span></li></ul><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Collab. Summit~~:</span></p><ul><li>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agree we should have a tech team meeting at the Linux Collab. Summit in April~~</span></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~SPDX package definitions~~</span></p><p><span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Hierarchical supply chain~~</span></p><ul><li>         <span style~~=~~"font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Ed has been updating the Wiki page with additional details on 1.0 and 1.1 comparisons to proposed model.~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Discussion and review or Ed’s proposal~~</span><ul><li>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Enhanced model for Annotations~~</span></li><li>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Mapping table of the SPDX 1.0 sections to the proposed model~~</span><ul><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Package file name – should this be mandatory?~~ ~~ In the case of the archive file containing the SPDX file itself, does it makes sense to include the filename in the SPDX?~~</span></li><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Package originator – may not required with the supply chain model.~~ ~~ Discussion about different scenarios (such as there is no original SPDX file).~~ ~~ May depend on people generating SPDX files for the code they bring in.~~</span></li><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Discussion on annotation types – adding specific types to annotations will allow for compatibility with earlier versions~~</span></li><li><span style="font-size: medium;">o</span>   <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Discussion on alternative using subclasses for packages~~</span><ul><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Are the properties specific to a package or something more general?~~</span></li><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Conflict with specificer model~~</span><ul><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Are we overloading the specifier with specifying the properties?~~</span></li><li>         <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Does RDF already provide the mechanisms for concrete and references to the concrete data?~~</span></li><li>  <span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Agree we should call SPDX Element SPDX Licensable~~</span></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p><span style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">~~Gary will do some homework on mapping the properties into a model where SPDX Package is subclassed from SPDX Licensable.~~ ~~ Will also do some thinking about how to implement the specifier mechanism.~~</span></p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Gary O’Neall
		+	* Bill Schineller
		+	* Kirsten Newcomer
		+	* Jack Manbeck
		+	* Savino Sguera
		+	* Peter Williams
		+	* Marshal Clow
		+	* Ed Warnicke
		+	* Rana Rahal
		+	* Brandon Robinson
		+
		+	== Agenda ==
		+
		+	* Large license text update
		+	* 1.1 date
		+	* Discussion on SPDX package definitions
		+	* Discuss proposal for hierarchical supply chain (bug 818)
		+
		+	== Update on license text ==
		+
		+	* Bug 1003 – could just keep the HTML formatting and update the pretty printer to interpret the tags
		+	* Will implement the license text as external text files encoded in UTF-8. Spreadsheet will contain a link to the file.
		+
		+	== Collab. Summit ==
		+
		+	* Agree we should have a tech team meeting at the Linux Collab. Summit in April
		+
		+	SPDX package definitions
		+
		+	== Hierarchical supply chain ==
		+
		+	* Ed has been updating the Wiki page with additional details on 1.0 and 1.1 comparisons to proposed model.
		+	* Discussion and review or Ed’s proposal
		+	** Enhanced model for Annotations
		+	** Mapping table of the SPDX 1.0 sections to the proposed model
		+	*** Package file name – should this be mandatory? In the case of the archive file containing the SPDX file itself, does it makes sense to include the filename in the SPDX?
		+	*** Package originator – may not required with the supply chain model. Discussion about different scenarios (such as there is no original SPDX file). May depend on people generating SPDX files for the code they bring in.
		+	*** Discussion on annotation types – adding specific types to annotations will allow for compatibility with earlier versions
		+	*** Discussion on alternative using subclasses for packages
		+	**** Are the properties specific to a package or something more general?
		+	**** Conflict with specificer model
		+	***** Are we overloading the specifier with specifying the properties?
		+	***** Does RDF already provide the mechanisms for concrete and references to the concrete data?
		+	***** Agree we should call SPDX Element SPDX Licensable
		+
		+	Gary will do some homework on mapping the properties into a model where SPDX Package is subclassed from SPDX Licensable. Will also do some thinking about how to implement the specifier mechanism.
		+
		+	[[Category:Technical\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]