Technical Team/Minutes/2011-04-12 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T13:03:06Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Goneall at 16:48, 12 April 2011

2011-04-12T16:48:16Z

New page

Minutes 4/12/2011 Attendees: Nicholas LokeKirsten NewcomerPeter WilliamsBill SchinellerKate Stewart Agenda:·         Plan for what remains·         Review spec – create a list of what’s missing·         Go through all remaining items Review Spec:·         Discussion on document format.  Agreed to add RDF XML examples to the sections and move the tag/value example under the tag/value·         The RDF and tag/value information will be separated out into different appendices.·         Peter will produce a new set of RDF documentation.   It will be included in the PDF document and the HTML will be posted to spdx.org/rdf/terms.  The documentation will be based on an OWL.  This will be provided by Sunday.·         Gary will generate examples for the RDF XML from the tools.  This will be done within 2 weeks.·         Section 3 – concern about having structure to the strings, for the RDF.  Data format for beta will be simple strings.  The tag/value should have a structure.  The RDF format for after beta TBD.·         Date Format – should we specify the date format?  Agreed to leave the spec as is (was highly discussed a year ago and the current format was the resolution).·         Should creator comments and  reviewer comments be rdfs:comment?  TBD (Peter – can you include a proposal when you document the RDF)·         Discussion on the RDF specific subsections – will make consistent once we add the documentation from Peter·         SourceInfo 4.6.6 should be changed to multi-line·         LicenseInfo fields – add the new syntax for license sets and mandatory 1·         Review of license terminology – will handle on the list (I’m not sure I completely captured this item)·         Section 5 Identifier Assigned -> Identifier·         Section 5.2 is currently 4.1 – renumber/format issue·         Review free form text fields (e.g. 5.1.13) for consistency for <text> … </text>.  Would prefer the subsection for data format to be just free form text and the tag example to include the <text> … </text>·         Possibly add a sentence or two in section 6, add the description for what happens if there is no archive file name for the package (use the package name).·         6.3.5 lowercase c in checksum·         ArtifactOf structure does not match well to the RDF format – Peter to propose a solution·         Reviewer – name string format – same issue with parsing strings in the RDF·         Inconsistent use of unspecified and unknown licenses – proposal to treat these as standard licenses and include them in Appendix I (and on the spdx.org/licenses website).·         Diagram – Analyzed file – is it a property of SPDX Doc or a just a property of the package?  Agreed to add a property at the SPDXDoc level for all file and OtherLicensing info.  This will allow for an easy extraction of all file information within an SPDX doc and easy extraction of all OtherLicensing info within a doc. Plan: Peter will provide the RDF information by Thursday.  We will review on Friday.  This will allow implementation to begin over the weekend.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Minutes 4/12/2011</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Attendees:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Nicholas Loke</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Kirsten Newcomer</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Peter Williams</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Bill Schineller</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Kate Stewart</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Agenda:</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Plan for what remains</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Review spec – create a list of what’s missing</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Go through all remaining items</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Review Spec:</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Discussion on document format.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Agreed to add RDF XML examples to the sections and move the tag/value example under the tag/value</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The RDF and tag/value information will be separated out into different appendices.</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Peter will produce a new set of RDF documentation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">   </span>It will be included in the PDF document and the HTML will be posted to spdx.org/rdf/terms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The documentation will be based on an OWL.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This will be provided by Sunday.</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Gary will generate examples for the RDF XML from the tools.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This will be done within 2 weeks.</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Section 3 – concern about having structure to the strings, for the RDF.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Data format for beta will be simple strings.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The tag/value should have a structure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The RDF format for after beta TBD.</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Date Format – should we specify the date format?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Agreed to leave the spec as is (was highly discussed a year ago and the current format was the resolution).</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Should creator comments and<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>reviewer comments be rdfs:comment?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>TBD (Peter – can you include a proposal when you document the RDF)</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Discussion on the RDF specific subsections – will make consistent once we add the documentation from Peter</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">SourceInfo 4.6.6 should be changed to multi-line</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">LicenseInfo fields – add the new syntax for license sets and mandatory 1</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Review of license terminology – will handle on the list (I’m not sure I completely captured this item)</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Section 5 Identifier Assigned -> Identifier</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Section 5.2 is currently 4.1 – renumber/format issue</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Review free form text fields (e.g. 5.1.13) for consistency for <text> … </text>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Would prefer the subsection for data format to be just free form text and the tag example to include the <text> … </text></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Possibly add a sentence or two in section 6, add the description for what happens if there is no archive file name for the package (use the package name).</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">6.3.5 lowercase c in checksum</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">ArtifactOf structure does not match well to the RDF format – Peter to propose a solution</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Reviewer – name string format – same issue with parsing strings in the RDF</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Inconsistent use of unspecified and unknown licenses – proposal to treat these as standard licenses and include them in Appendix I (and on the spdx.org/licenses website).</span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-family: Symbol; mso-fareast-font-family: Symbol; mso-bidi-font-family: Symbol;"><span style="mso-list: Ignore;"><span style="font-size: small;">·</span><span style="font: 7pt "Times New Roman";">         </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Diagram – Analyzed file – is it a property of SPDX Doc or a just a property of the package? <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Agreed to add a property at the SPDXDoc level for all file and OtherLicensing info.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This will allow for an easy extraction of all file information within an SPDX doc and easy extraction of all OtherLicensing info within a doc.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Plan: Peter will provide the RDF information by Thursday.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We will review on Friday.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This will allow implementation to begin over the weekend.</span></p>	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Nicholas Loke
		+	* Kirsten Newcomer
		+	* Peter Williams
		+	* Bill Schineller
		+	* Kate Stewart
		+
		+	== Agenda ==
		+
		+	* Plan for what remains
		+	* Review spec – create a list of what’s missing
		+	* Go through all remaining items
		+
		+	== Review Spec ==
		+
		+	* Discussion on document format. Agreed to add RDF XML examples to the sections and move the tag/value example under the tag/value
		+	* The RDF and tag/value information will be separated out into different appendices.
		+	* Peter will produce a new set of RDF documentation. It will be included in the PDF document and the HTML will be posted to spdx.org/rdf/terms. The documentation will be based on an OWL. This will be provided by Sunday.
		+	* Gary will generate examples for the RDF XML from the tools. This will be done within 2 weeks.
		+	* Section 3 – concern about having structure to the strings, for the RDF. Data format for beta will be simple strings. The tag/value should have a structure. The RDF format for after beta TBD.
		+	* Date Format – should we specify the date format? Agreed to leave the spec as is (was highly discussed a year ago and the current format was the resolution).
		+	* Should creator comments and reviewer comments be rdfs:comment? TBD (Peter – can you include a proposal when you document the RDF)
		+	* Discussion on the RDF specific subsections – will make consistent once we add the documentation from Peter
		+	* SourceInfo 4.6.6 should be changed to multi-line
		+	* LicenseInfo fields – add the new syntax for license sets and mandatory 1
		+	* Review of license terminology – will handle on the list (I’m not sure I completely captured this item)
		+	* Section 5 Identifier Assigned → Identifier
		+	* Section 5.2 is currently 4.1 – renumber/format issue
		+	* Review free form text fields (e.g. 5.1.13) for consistency for <text> … </text>. Would prefer the subsection for data format to be just free form text and the tag example to include the <text> … </text>
		+	* Possibly add a sentence or two in section 6, add the description for what happens if there is no archive file name for the package (use the package name).
		+	* 6.3.5 lowercase c in checksum
		+	* ArtifactOf structure does not match well to the RDF format – Peter to propose a solution
		+	* Reviewer – name string format – same issue with parsing strings in the RDF
		+	* Inconsistent use of unspecified and unknown licenses – proposal to treat these as standard licenses and include them in Appendix I (and on the spdx.org/licenses website).
		+	* Diagram – Analyzed file – is it a property of SPDX Doc or a just a property of the package? Agreed to add a property at the SPDXDoc level for all file and OtherLicensing info. This will allow for an easy extraction of all file information within an SPDX doc and easy extraction of all OtherLicensing info within a doc.
		+
		+	Plan: Peter will provide the RDF information by Thursday. We will review on Friday. This will allow implementation to begin over the weekend.
		+
		+	[[Category:Technical\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]