Jlovejoy at 19:07, 21 November 2013

2013-11-21T19:07:19Z

Jlovejoy: Created page with "== Attendees == * Jilayne Lovejoy * Dennis * Zac White * Jack Manbeck * Paul Madick == Agenda == 1) Fedora list (Zac) - went through next set of licenses to view and made no..."

2013-11-21T18:37:57Z

Created page with "== Attendees == * Jilayne Lovejoy * Dennis * Zac White * Jack Manbeck * Paul Madick == Agenda == 1) Fedora list (Zac) - went through next set of licenses to view and made no..."

New page

== Attendees ==

* Jilayne Lovejoy
* Dennis
* Zac White
* Jack Manbeck
* Paul Madick

== Agenda ==
1) Fedora list (Zac) - went through next set of licenses to view and made notes here and updates to spreadsheet
# Beerware - add, use same short identifier
# BeOpen - troubling to add as individual license b/c part of the greater Python license; no on call has seen it used by itself, lean towards not adding (maybe talk to Fedora to see if they have a use-case of it being used alone??) NO to adding it for now
# Bibtex - earlier version of now-called Latex licenses; this is from 1985... no one's seen it currently and some issues with filenames within license text itself, in terms of matching guidelines, etc. lean towards not adding it for now
# BSD (no advertising) - same as BSD-3-Clause, so do not need to add
# BSD with advertising - looks to be same as BSD-4-Clause, but with additional text at beginning, not going to add, but also not going to make statement whether or not it's "equivalent"
# BSD (two clause) - Fedora calls this just "BSD: - it's the same as SPDX-LL, FreeBSD license, so no need to add, just capture short identifier issues
# BSD Protection - unique license; add, use same short identifier
# BSD with attribution - add, (check that it is indeed verbatim 3-clause, plus another clause; sort of Apache 1.1-ish; add, but different short identifer than Fedora to better line up with SPDX naming; add note re: "fourth" clause and why it's not called "BSD-4-Clause"

2) Because Tom Vidal and Mark Gisi were not on call, decided to not get into GPL exception spreadsheet on this call; priority for next call, if possible.

[[Category:Legal|Minutes]]
[[Category:Minutes]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == Agenda ==
 ) Fedora list (Zac) - went through next set of licenses to view and made notes here and updates to spreadsheet
-# Beerware - add, use same short identifier
+# Beerware - ADD, use same short identifier
 # BeOpen - troubling to add as individual license b/c part of the greater Python license; no on call has seen it used by itself, lean towards not adding (maybe talk to Fedora to see if they have a use-case of it being used alone??) NO to adding it for now
-# Bibtex - earlier version of now-called Latex licenses; this is from 1985... no one's seen it currently and some issues with filenames within license text itself, in terms of matching guidelines, etc.  lean towards not adding it for now
+# Bibtex - earlier version of now-called Latex licenses; this is from 1985... no one's seen it currently and some issues with filenames within license text itself, in terms of matching guidelines, etc.  lean towards not adding it for now; NO
 # BSD (no advertising) - same as BSD-3-Clause, so do not need to add
-# BSD with advertising - looks to be same as BSD-4-Clause, but with additional text at beginning, not going to add, but also not going to make statement whether or not it's "equivalent"
+# BSD with advertising - looks to be same as BSD-4-Clause (confirmed), but with additional text at beginning that essentially repeats the advertising clause at the top. discussed whether this could be notated as equivalent (for matching purposes) with BSD-4-Clause; Not going to add, but also not going to make statement whether or not it's "equivalent"
-# BSD (two clause) - Fedora calls this just "BSD: - it's the same as SPDX-LL, FreeBSD license, so no need to add, just capture short identifier issues
+# BSD (two clause) - Fedora calls this just "BSD" - it's the same as SPDX-LL, FreeBSD license, so no need to add, just capture short identifier issue
-# BSD Protection - unique license; add, use same short identifier
+# BSD Protection - unique license; ADD, use same short identifier
-# BSD with attribution - add, (check that it is indeed verbatim 3-clause, plus another clause; sort of Apache 1.1-ish; add, but different short identifer than Fedora to better line up with SPDX naming; add note re: "fourth" clause and why it's not called "BSD-4-Clause"
+# BSD with attribution -  it is verbatim 3-clause, plus another clause; sort of Apache 1.1-ish; ADD, but will use different short identifier than Fedora to better line up with SPDX naming; add note re: "fourth" clause and why it's not called "BSD-4-Clause" to avoid questions on this later
 ) Because Tom Vidal and Mark Gisi were not on call, decided to not get into GPL exception spreadsheet on this call; priority for next call, if possible.

Legal Team/Minutes/2013-11-21 - Revision history

Jlovejoy at 19:07, 21 November 2013

Jlovejoy: Created page with "== Attendees == * Jilayne Lovejoy * Dennis * Zac White * Jack Manbeck * Paul Madick == Agenda == 1) Fedora list (Zac) - went through next set of licenses to view and made no..."