Legal Team/Minutes/2011-04-20 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-05T18:45:57Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Jlovejoy at 19:55, 16 December 2011

2011-12-16T19:55:35Z

Rockett at 12:56, 11 May 2011

2011-05-11T12:56:22Z

Rockett at 12:55, 11 May 2011

2011-05-11T12:55:31Z

New page

SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011 Attendees:Esteban Rockett (Motorola)Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)Phil Odence (Blackduck)Paul Madick (HP)Kate Stewart (Canonical)Michael Herzog (NexB)Scott Peterson (HP)Any Wilson (Intel) ** Minutes:- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. - For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches.  Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.***<div></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 5 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p> </p><p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>~~Attendees~~:</p><p>~~Esteban Rockett (Motorola)~~</p><p>~~Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)~~</p><p>~~Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)~~</p><p>~~Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)~~</p><p>~~Phil Odence (Blackduck)~~</p><p>~~Paul Madick (HP)~~</p><p>~~Kate Stewart (Canonical)~~</p><p>~~Michael Herzog (NexB)~~</p><p>~~Scott Peterson (HP)~~</p><p>~~Andy Wilson (Intel)~~</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>~~Minutes~~:</p><p>-~~ The group continued to drive on the below key issues:~~</p><p>(1)~~ The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;~~</p><p>(2)~~ Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and~~</p><p>(3)~~ Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.~~ </p><p>-~~ For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.~~</p><p>-~~ For #2, the group began discussing the ~~Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (~~http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches. ~~ ~~Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.~~</p><p>*</p><p> </p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
		+	* Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
		+	* Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
		+	* Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
		+	* Phil Odence (Blackduck)
		+	* Paul Madick (HP)
		+	* Kate Stewart (Canonical)
		+	* Michael Herzog (NexB)
		+	* Scott Peterson (HP)
		+	* Andy Wilson (Intel)
		+
		+	== Minutes ==
		+
		+	The group continued to drive on the below key issues:
		+
		+	# The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;
		+	# Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and
		+	# Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata.
		+
		+	For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.
		+
		+	For #2, the group began discussing the [http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/\|Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0], and other alternative approaches. Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.
		+
		+	[[Category:Legal\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 16 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p> </p><p>SPDX Legal ~~Worksteam~~ Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. </p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches.  Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>*</p><p> </p>	+	<p> </p><p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. </p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches.  Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>*</p><p> </p>

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 11 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	<p><p>SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>~~Any~~ Wilson (Intel)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. </p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches.  Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>*</p><~~div></div~~></p>	+	<p> </p><p>SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 20-April-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group continued to drive on the below key issues:</p><p>(1) The "licensing/legal terms/disclaimer" for the SPDX meta-data;</p><p>(2) Method to revise SPDX metadata, including the option of using a changelog; and</p><p>(3) Confidentiality-state of SPDX metadata. </p><p>- For #3 above, the group concluded that both a mandatory "radio-button" style confidentiality feature should be included in the specification, with an optional open text field for additional text, if needed.</p><p>- For #2, the group began discussing the Open Data Commons PDDL 1.0 (http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/), and other alternative approaches.  Creative Commons was re-visited and explained that CC is problematic if the author/creator can be anonymous as previously agreed.</p><p>*</p><p> </p>