Legal Team/Minutes/2011-03-23 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-05T18:49:00Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Jlovejoy at 19:54, 16 December 2011

2011-12-16T19:54:42Z

Rockett at 13:00, 11 May 2011

2011-05-11T13:00:54Z

New page

SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 23-March-2011 Attendees:Esteban Rockett (Motorola)Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)Phil Odence (Blackduck) Paul Madick (HP)Kate Stewart (Canonical)Michael Herzog (NexB)Scott Peterson (HP) ** Minutes:- The group re-reported that the SPDX Tools License is concluded to be Apache 2.0.  Further, the SPDX team will recommend that any 3rd party desiring to open source SPDX tools, also license such 3rd party tools under the Apache 2.0 license.  No objections.- Kate confirmed that revised section 5.3 was being placed into the SPDX Beta Specification.- Discussions began on "whether there is a need for the Author/Creator" field.  - A changelog approach to revisions of SPDX metadata was initially suggested by Kate.  Tom and others substantially added.- The "Confidentiality Statement/Field" was discussed, and generally agreed, but no specific implementation(s) was been concluded.- Update on the "Templatizing" effort was given.  See http://spdx.org/wiki/guidelines-templatizing-licenses- It was suggested that we provide a public facing site of all known SPDX tools, when such tools are available.***<div></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 5 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 23-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>~~Attendees~~:</p><p>~~Esteban Rockett (Motorola)~~</p><p>~~Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)~~</p><p>~~Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)~~</p><p>~~Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)~~</p><p>~~Phil Odence (Blackduck) ~~Paul~~ Madick (HP)~~</p><p>~~Kate Stewart (Canonical)~~</p><p>~~Michael Herzog (NexB)~~</p><p>~~Scott Peterson (HP)~~</p><p> </p><p>~~</p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group re-reported that the SPDX Tools License is concluded to be Apache 2.0. ~~ ~~Further, the SPDX team will recommend that any 3rd party desiring to open source SPDX tools, also license such 3rd party tools under the Apache 2.0 license. ~~ ~~No objections.~~</p><p>-~~ Kate confirmed that revised section 5.3 was being placed into the SPDX Beta Specification.~~</p><p>-~~ Discussions began on "whether there is a need for the Author/Creator" field. ~~ </p><p>-~~ A changelog approach to revisions of SPDX metadata was initially suggested by Kate. ~~ ~~Tom and others substantially added.~~</p><p>-~~ The "Confidentiality Statement/Field" was discussed, and generally agreed, but no specific implementation(s) was been concluded.~~</p><p>-~~ Update on the "Templatizing" effort was given. ~~ ~~See http://spdx.org/wiki/guidelines-templatizing-licenses~~</p><p>-~~ It was suggested that we provide a public facing site of all known SPDX tools, when such tools are available.~~</p><p>*</p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
		+	* Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
		+	* Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
		+	* Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
		+	* Phil Odence (Blackduck)
		+	* Paul Madick (HP)
		+	* Kate Stewart (Canonical)
		+	* Michael Herzog (NexB)
		+	* Scott Peterson (HP)
		+
		+	== Minutes ==
		+
		+	* The group re-reported that the SPDX Tools License is concluded to be Apache 2.0. Further, the SPDX team will recommend that any 3rd party desiring to open source SPDX tools, also license such 3rd party tools under the Apache 2.0 license. No objections.
		+	* Kate confirmed that revised section 5.3 was being placed into the SPDX Beta Specification.
		+	* Discussions began on "whether there is a need for the Author/Creator" field.
		+	* A changelog approach to revisions of SPDX metadata was initially suggested by Kate. Tom and others substantially added.
		+	* The "Confidentiality Statement/Field" was discussed, and generally agreed, but no specific implementation(s) was been concluded.
		+	* Update on the "Templatizing" effort was given. See http://spdx.org/wiki/guidelines-templatizing-licenses
		+	* It was suggested that we provide a public facing site of all known SPDX tools, when such tools are available.
		+
		+	[[Category:Legal\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 16 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p>~~<p>SPDX Legal ~~Worksteam~~ Meeting Minutes – 23-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck) Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group re-reported that the SPDX Tools License is concluded to be Apache 2.0.  Further, the SPDX team will recommend that any 3rd party desiring to open source SPDX tools, also license such 3rd party tools under the Apache 2.0 license.  No objections.</p><p>- Kate confirmed that revised section 5.3 was being placed into the SPDX Beta Specification.</p><p>- Discussions began on "whether there is a need for the Author/Creator" field.  </p><p>- A changelog approach to revisions of SPDX metadata was initially suggested by Kate.  Tom and others substantially added.</p><p>- The "Confidentiality Statement/Field" was discussed, and generally agreed, but no specific implementation(s) was been concluded.</p><p>- Update on the "Templatizing" effort was given.  See http://spdx.org/wiki/guidelines-templatizing-licenses</p><p>- It was suggested that we provide a public facing site of all known SPDX tools, when such tools are available.</p><p>*~~</p><div></div>~~</p>	+	<p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 23-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck) Paul Madick (HP)</p><p>Kate Stewart (Canonical)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Minutes:</p><p>- The group re-reported that the SPDX Tools License is concluded to be Apache 2.0.  Further, the SPDX team will recommend that any 3rd party desiring to open source SPDX tools, also license such 3rd party tools under the Apache 2.0 license.  No objections.</p><p>- Kate confirmed that revised section 5.3 was being placed into the SPDX Beta Specification.</p><p>- Discussions began on "whether there is a need for the Author/Creator" field.  </p><p>- A changelog approach to revisions of SPDX metadata was initially suggested by Kate.  Tom and others substantially added.</p><p>- The "Confidentiality Statement/Field" was discussed, and generally agreed, but no specific implementation(s) was been concluded.</p><p>- Update on the "Templatizing" effort was given.  See http://spdx.org/wiki/guidelines-templatizing-licenses</p><p>- It was suggested that we provide a public facing site of all known SPDX tools, when such tools are available.</p><p>*</p>