Legal Team/Minutes/2011-03-09 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-05T18:49:03Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Jlovejoy at 19:54, 16 December 2011

2011-12-16T19:54:10Z

Rockett at 13:02, 11 May 2011

2011-05-11T13:02:19Z

New page

SPDX Legal Worksteam Meeting Minutes – 09-March-2011 Attendees:Esteban Rockett (Motorola)Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)Phil Odence (Blackduck)Andy Wilson (Intel)Michael Herzog (NexB)Scott Peterson (HP) **- This meeting was limited to discussion of the below proposals:- The Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the license for all tools created by the SPDX group, inclusive of shell scripts. - Further, the Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the suggested license to 3rd parties for any 3rd party desiring to open source a SPDX tool.- All in attendance were in agreement to the above.  No objections.***

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 5 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 09-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>~~Attendees~~:</p><p>~~Esteban Rockett (Motorola)~~</p><p>~~Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)~~</p><p>~~Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)~~</p><p>~~Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)~~</p><p>~~Phil Odence (Blackduck)~~</p><p>~~Andy Wilson (Intel)~~</p><p>~~Michael Herzog (NexB)~~</p><p>~~Scott Peterson (HP)~~</p><p> </p><p></p><p>-~~ This meeting was limited to discussion of the below proposals:~~</p><p>-~~ The Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the license for all tools created by the SPDX group, inclusive of shell scripts.~~ </p><p>-~~ Further, the Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the suggested license to 3rd parties for any 3rd party desiring to open source a SPDX tool.~~</p><p>-~~ All in attendance were in agreement to the above. ~~ ~~No objections.~~</p><p>*</p>~~	+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Esteban Rockett (Motorola)
		+	* Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)
		+	* Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)
		+	* Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)
		+	* Phil Odence (Blackduck)
		+	* Andy Wilson (Intel)
		+	* Michael Herzog (NexB)
		+	* Scott Peterson (HP)
		+
		+	== Minutes ==
		+
		+	This meeting was limited to discussion of the below proposals:
		+
		+	* The Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the license for all tools created by the SPDX group, inclusive of shell scripts.
		+	* Further, the Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the suggested license to 3rd parties for any 3rd party desiring to open source a SPDX tool.
		+	* All in attendance were in agreement to the above. No objections.
		+
		+	[[Category:Legal\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 16 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<p>~~<p>SPDX Legal ~~Worksteam~~ Meeting Minutes – 09-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p> </p><p></p><p>- This meeting was limited to discussion of the below proposals:</p><p>- The Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the license for all tools created by the SPDX group, inclusive of shell scripts. </p><p>- Further, the Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the suggested license to 3rd parties for any 3rd party desiring to open source a SPDX tool.</p><p>- All in attendance were in agreement to the above.  No objections.</p><p>*~~</p>~~</p>	+	<p>SPDX Legal Team Meeting Minutes – 09-March-2011</p><p> </p><p>Attendees:</p><p>Esteban Rockett (Motorola)</p><p>Karen Copenhaver (LF/Choate)</p><p>Jilayne Lovejoy (OpenLogic)</p><p>Tom Incorvia (Microfocus)</p><p>Phil Odence (Blackduck)</p><p>Andy Wilson (Intel)</p><p>Michael Herzog (NexB)</p><p>Scott Peterson (HP)</p><p> </p><p></p><p>- This meeting was limited to discussion of the below proposals:</p><p>- The Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the license for all tools created by the SPDX group, inclusive of shell scripts. </p><p>- Further, the Apache 2.0 license was proposed as the suggested license to 3rd parties for any 3rd party desiring to open source a SPDX tool.</p><p>- All in attendance were in agreement to the above.  No objections.</p><p>*</p>