MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

2013-03-06T10:59:20Z

Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Podence at 12:36, 9 February 2012

2012-02-09T12:36:33Z

New page

<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; margin: 8px;">Attendance: 9 Minutes for 2011/12/15 approved       Technical Team Report - Gary <ul><li>Much focus on defining approach for 2.0 spec.</li><li>Two key elements: Hierarchy and time element (revisions, supply chain, approvals)</li><li>Progress forward, but some concern that we are not converging rapidly enough</li><li>Key discussion about backwards compatibility and how important it is for 2.0.</li></ul>Business Team Report - Kim<ul><li>New website has been recent focus.</li><ul><li>There was a training meeting and an email went to voluteers for content migration.</li><li>Web team is implementing the new menu structure and will then green light volunteers to move content.</li><li>That will take two weeks, followed by cleanup.</li></ul><li>License List addition process</li><ul><li>Dusted off notes from previous discussion and concluded it looked pretty good.</li><li>Kim working with legal team to review</li><li>Then we need to publish and implement</li></ul><li>Community outreach re: data license</li><ul><li>Kim reaching out to Gentoo, Fedora, Eclipse</li><li>Thumbs up from Gentoo; waiting on Fedora and Eclipse</li><li>Adding Gentoo licenses to license list</li></ul><li>SPDX outreach meeting</li><ul><li>Silicon Valley, April 6; plans in motion</li></ul></ul>Legal Team Report - Jilayne <ul><li>Preample to data license complete and will be published.</li><li>License List</li><ul><li>License "Templatizing" is taking a new approach; better described as "license list matching guidelines."</li><li>Good progress; lots of concensus</li><li>Discussion about best form or forms in which to publish (CSV, Excel, HTML)</li></ul></ul>Cross Functional Issues – Phil<ul><li>Heads up- Potential for need for modest SPDX funding from participating companies in the future. Probably a when, not if. </li></ul>Open Action Items<ul><li>Phil- If it looks like 2.0 may have backward compatibility issues, call broad meeting for community input.</li></ul>Attendees<ul class="ul1"><li class="li2">Phil Odence, Black Duck Software</li><li class="li2">Kim Weins, OpenLogic</li><li class="li2">Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor</li><li>Tom Incorvia, Microfocus</li><li>Pierre LaPonte, nexB</li><li>Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic</li><li>Jack Manbeck, TI</li><li>Steve Cropper, Cisco</li><li>Chuck Gaudreau, Protecode</li></ul></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:59, 6 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<div style="background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffff; margin: 8px;"><p>~~Attendance: 9~~<br />~~Minutes for 2011/12/15 approved~~<br />     <br /><strong>~~Technical Team Report - Gary~~<br /></strong></p><ul><li>~~Much focus on defining approach for 2.0 spec.~~</li><li>~~Two key elements: Hierarchy and time element (revisions, supply chain, approvals)~~</li><li>~~Progress forward, but some concern that we are not converging rapidly enough~~</li><li>~~Key discussion about backwards compatibility and how important it is for 2.0.~~</li></ul><p><strong>~~Business Team Report - Kim~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~New website has been recent focus.~~</li><ul><li>~~There was a training meeting and an email went to voluteers for content migration.~~</li><li>~~Web team is implementing the new menu structure and will then green light volunteers to move content.~~</li><li>~~That will take two weeks, followed by cleanup.~~</li></ul><li>~~License List addition process~~</li><ul><li>~~Dusted off notes from previous discussion and concluded it looked pretty good.~~</li><li>~~Kim working with legal team to review~~</li><li>~~Then we need to publish and implement~~</li></ul><li>~~Community outreach re: data license~~</li><ul><li>~~Kim reaching out to Gentoo, Fedora, Eclipse~~</li><li>~~Thumbs up from Gentoo; waiting on Fedora and Eclipse~~</li><li>~~Adding Gentoo licenses to license list~~</li></ul><li>~~SPDX outreach meeting~~</li><ul><li>~~Silicon Valley, April 6; plans in motion~~</li></ul></ul><p><strong>~~Legal Team Report - Jilayne~~<br /></strong></p><ul><li>~~Preample to data license complete and will be published.~~</li><li>~~License List~~</li><ul><li>~~License "Templatizing" is taking a new approach; better described as "license list matching guidelines."~~</li><li>~~Good progress; lots of concensus~~</li><li>~~Discussion about best form or forms in which to publish (CSV, Excel, HTML)~~</li></ul></ul><p><strong>~~Cross Functional Issues – Phil~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Heads up- Potential for need for modest SPDX funding from participating companies in the future. Probably a when, not if.~~ </li></ul><p><strong>~~Open Action Items~~</strong></p><ul><li>~~Phil- If it looks like 2.0 may have backward compatibility issues, call broad meeting for community input.~~</li></ul><p class~~=~~"p1"><strong>~~Attendees~~</strong></p><ul class~~=~~"ul1"><li class~~=~~"li2">~~Phil Odence, Black Duck Software~~</li><li class="li2">~~Kim Weins, OpenLogic~~</li><li class="li2">~~Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor~~</li><li>~~Tom Incorvia, Microfocus~~</li><li>~~Pierre LaPonte, nexB~~</li><li>~~Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic~~</li><li>~~Jack Manbeck, TI~~</li><li>~~Steve Cropper, Cisco~~</li><li>~~Chuck Gaudreau, Protecode~~</li></ul></div>~~	+	* Attendance: 9
		+	* Minutes for 2011/12/15 approved
		+
		+	== Technical Team Report - Gary ==
		+
		+	* Much focus on defining approach for 2.0 spec.
		+	* Two key elements: Hierarchy and time element (revisions, supply chain, approvals)
		+	* Progress forward, but some concern that we are not converging rapidly enough
		+	* Key discussion about backwards compatibility and how important it is for 2.0.
		+
		+	== Business Team Report - Kim ==
		+
		+	* New website has been recent focus.
		+	** There was a training meeting and an email went to voluteers for content migration.
		+	** Web team is implementing the new menu structure and will then green light volunteers to move content.
		+	** That will take two weeks, followed by cleanup.
		+	* License List addition process
		+	** Dusted off notes from previous discussion and concluded it looked pretty good.
		+	** Kim working with legal team to review
		+	** Then we need to publish and implement
		+	* Community outreach re: data license
		+	** Kim reaching out to Gentoo, Fedora, Eclipse
		+	** Thumbs up from Gentoo; waiting on Fedora and Eclipse
		+	** Adding Gentoo licenses to license list
		+	* SPDX outreach meeting
		+	** Silicon Valley, April 6; plans in motion
		+
		+	== Legal Team Report - Jilayne ==
		+
		+	* Preample to data license complete and will be published.
		+	* License List
		+	** License "Templatizing" is taking a new approach; better described as "license list matching guidelines."
		+	** Good progress; lots of concensus
		+	** Discussion about best form or forms in which to publish (CSV, Excel, HTML)
		+
		+	== Cross Functional Issues – Phil ==
		+
		+	* Heads up- Potential for need for modest SPDX funding from participating companies in the future. Probably a when, not if.
		+
		+	== Open Action Items ==
		+
		+	* Phil- If it looks like 2.0 may have backward compatibility issues, call broad meeting for community input.
		+
		+	== Attendees ==
		+
		+	* Phil Odence, Black Duck Software
		+	* Kim Weins, OpenLogic
		+	* Gary O'Neall, Source Auditor
		+	* Tom Incorvia, Microfocus
		+	* Pierre LaPonte, nexB
		+	* Jilayne Lovejoy, OpenLogic
		+	* Jack Manbeck, TI
		+	* Steve Cropper, Cisco
		+	* Chuck Gaudreau, Protecode
		+
		+	[[Category:General\|Minutes]]
		+	[[Category:Minutes]]

General Meeting/Minutes/2012-01-26 - Revision history

MartinMichlmayr: Convert to MediaWiki syntax

Podence at 12:36, 9 February 2012